Motion-based identity authentication of an individual with a communications device

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods securely authenticate an identity of an individual based on a pattern that is traced by the individual. Embodiments relate to prompting an individual with a pattern to trace when attempting to authenticate the identity of the individual during an identity authentication session. Motion-based behavior data that is generated by motions executed by the individual as the individual traces the pattern is captured via a motion-capturing sensor. The motion-based behavior data is unique to the individual and has a low likelihood of being duplicated by an unauthorized individual attempting to fraudulently pose as the individual. The captured motion-based behavior data is compared to previously-captured motion-based behavior data from previous traces of the pattern completed by the individual. The identity of the individual is authenticated when the motion-based behavior data is within a threshold of the previously captured motion-based behavior data.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. application No. 61/822,487filed on May 13, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety. This application also claims the benefit of U.S. applicationSer. No. 14/178,476 filed on Feb. 12, 2014, which is incorporated hereinby reference in its entirety. This application also claims the benefitof International Application No. PCT/US14/15995 filed on Feb. 12, 2014,which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

A tradeoff exists between providing secure authentication of anindividual's identity while not over-burdening the individual withdaunting authentication requirements. Identity authentication should besecure so that the individual is not susceptible to identity theftduring identity authentication. The identity authentication should alsobe convenient for the individual so that the individual can easilyparticipate in identity authentication and engage in the activitiesprotected by the authentication.

Conventional identity authentication techniques include conventionalauthentication of a personal identification number (PIN) and/or apassword provided by the individual seeking authentication. Conventionalauthentication of a PIN and/or a password includes an inherent tradeoffbetween security and convenience for the individual. There is asignificant threat of identity theft from hackers attempting to stealthe individual's PIN and/or password to gain access to the individual'sactivities associated with the entity. For example, hackers may attemptto steal an individual's password to the individual's online bankingaccount provided by the individual's bank. In order to increase thedifficulty of the hacker from gaining access to an individual's PINand/or password, the individual should generate a complicated PIN and/orpassword that differs for each entity that the individual is engagedwith that requires identity authentication. The complicated PIN and/orpassword should also be unrelated to personal aspects of the individual,such as the individual's birth date.

However, having a complicated PIN and/or password that differs for eachentity and is unrelated to the personal aspects of the individualincreases the difficulty of the individual to easily recall theappropriate PIN and/or password for each entity. This increaseddifficulty adds an inconvenience to the individual because theindividual may not be able to recall the appropriate PIN and/or passwordwhen attempting to engage the entity. For example, the individual maynot recall their PIN when attempting to access money from an automaticteller machine (ATM). Without the proper PIN, the individual cannotobtain the requested funds from the ATM and would have to takeadditional measures to determine the proper PIN.

In order to increase the ease of the individual to remember theappropriate PIN and/or password for each entity, the individual mayselect the same PIN and/or password for each entity that the individualis engaged with and/or also associate the PIN and/or password to apersonal aspect of the individual. For example, the individual mayselect the individual's birth date as the PIN and/or password for everyentity the individual is engaged. Although this increases theconvenience of the individual to easily recall the appropriate PINand/or password, this increases the susceptibility of the individual toidentity theft. A hacker simply needs to obtain the PIN and/or passwordfor the individual for a single entity and then can have access to everyother entity the individual is engaged with that uses the stolen PINand/or password for identity authentication.

Conventional identity authentication techniques also includeconventional hardware and/or software tokens required by an entity toauthenticate the individual's identity. Conventional hardware and/orsoftware tokens also include an inherent tradeoff between security andconvenience for the individual. Conventional hardware and/or softwaretokens are more difficult to obtain via hacking into an entity's systemto obtain the individual's PIN and/or password. Conventional hardwareand/or software tokens are also more difficult to duplicate viacomputation than the individual's PIN and/or password. However,conventional hardware and/or software tokens can physically be stolen.Once stolen, the individual's activities associated with the entity thatrequires the conventional hardware and/or software token for identityauthentication are compromised and can be accessed.

For example, once the conventional hardware token is physically stolen,the individual's bank accounts associated with the bank that requiresthe conventional hardware token to authenticate the individual'sidentity are now accessible to the possessor of the conventionalhardware token. The individual also has the added inconvenience of notbeing able to access the bank accounts when the individual forgets tobring the conventional hardware token to the bank. The individual wouldhave to take additional measures to obtain the conventional hardwaretoken before being able to access the bank accounts.

Conventional identity authentication techniques also includeconventional biometric imprints. A conventional biometric imprint is adigital scan of a physical aspect of the individual. For example, aconventional biometric imprint includes a digital scan of anindividual's fingerprint. The conventional biometric imprint is uniqueto the individual in that no other individual can have a substantiallyidentical biometric imprint. Each individual has fingerprints unique tothemselves. The conventional biometric imprint is also convenient forthe individual because the individual always has their fingers availableto be digitally scanned when engaged in an identity authenticationsession. However, the individual also leaves their fingerprints onphysical objects that can easily be digitally scanned and replicated.Once an individual's fingerprint has been digitally scanned, replicatedand essentially stolen, the individual's activities are now susceptiblewith every entity that presently require the individual's fingerprintand any entity in the future that requires the individual's fingerprint.Unlike a PIN and/or password, the individual cannot change theirfingerprint.

For example, an individual's fingerprint is digitally scanned by a thirdparty unknown to the individual from a touch screen at a gas pump afterthe individual operated the gas pump leaving their fingerprints at thegas pump. The individual's fingerprint has now been stolen and can beused to fraudulently access the individual's bank accounts associatedwith a bank that requires the digital scanning of the individual'sfingerprint to authenticate the individual's identity. Digitally scannedfingerprints are also stored as electronic data, thereby exposing theindividual's fingerprint data to hackers. The individual cannot changetheir fingerprint so now the individual's activities associated with thebank or any future entity that requires digital scanning of theindividual's fingerprint for identity authentication are now accessibleto others in possession of the digital scan of the individual'sfingerprint.

BRIEF SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present invention relate to secure authentication ofan individual's identity with a communications device by authenticatingmotions, such as hand motions, executed by the individual. In anembodiment, a method provides for securely authenticating an identity ofan individual using a communications device based on a pattern that istraced by the individual. A defined pattern may be identified by a userinterface of the communications device to the individual for theindividual to trace. A traced pattern generated from continuouslytracing the defined pattern by the individual from an initial point onthe defined pattern to an end point on the defined pattern via the userinterface of the communications device may be received. Motion-basedbehavior data may be compared with previously captured motion-basedbehavior data to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.

In an embodiment, a communications device securely authenticates anindividual based on a pattern that may be traced by the individual. Auser interface is configured to identify a defined pattern to theindividual for the individual to trace. A transceiver is configured toreceive a traced pattern from the individual generated from continuouslytracing the defined pattern by the individual from an initial point onthe defined pattern to an end point on the defined pattern via the userinterface. This information is stored as motion-based behavior data. Acomparing module is configured to compare motion-based behavior datawith previously captured motion-based behavior data to therebyauthenticate the identity of the individual.

In an embodiment, a method provides for securely authenticating anidentity of an individual using a communications device based on apattern that is traced by the individual. A traced pattern generatedfrom continuously tracing the defined pattern by the individual from aninitial point on the defined pattern to an end point on the definedpattern may be received via a user interface of the communicationsdevice. Contact data generated from a finger of the individual being incontact with the user interface of the communications device as theindividual continuously traces the defined pattern may be analyzed. Thecontact data may be compared with previously captured contact data tothereby authenticate the identity of the individual.

In an embodiment, a communications device securely authenticates anidentity of an individual based on a pattern that is traced by theindividual. A transceiver is configured to receive a traced patterngenerated from continuously tracing the defined pattern by theindividual from an initial point on the defined pattern to an end pointon the defined pattern via a user interface of the communicationsdevice. An analyzer is configured to analyze contact data generated froma finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface ofthe communications device as the individual continuously traces thedefined pattern. A comparing module is configured to compare the contactdata with previously captured contact data to thereby authenticate theidentity of the individual.

In an embodiment, a method provides securely authenticating an identityof an individual using a communications device based on a pattern thatis traced by the individual. A traced pattern generated fromcontinuously tracing the defined pattern by the individual from aninitial point on the defined pattern to an end on the defined patternvia the user interface of the communications device may be received.Motion-based behavior data may be compared with previously capturedmotion-based behavior data to thereby authenticate the identity of theindividual. Confirmation that the identity of the individual isauthenticated when the motion-based behavior data is within a thresholdof the previously captured motion-based behavior data may be transmittedto an identification server supported by the an entity that theindividual is attempting to engage. A personal identification number maybe received from the identification server for the individual to inputinto an authentication session supported by the entity.

In an embodiment, a communications device securely authenticates anidentity of an individual based on a pattern that is traced by theindividual. A comparing module is configured to compare motion-basedbehavior data with previously captured contact motion-based behaviordata to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual. Atransceiver is configured to receive a traced pattern generated fromcontinuously tracing the defined pattern by the individual from aninitial point on the defined pattern to an end point on the definedpattern via a user interface of the communications device. Thetransceiver is also configured to transmit confirmation to anidentification server supported by an entity that the individual isattempting to engage that the identity of the individual isauthenticated when the motion-based behavior data is within a thresholdof the previously captured motion-based behavior data. The transceiveris also configured to receive a personal identification number from theidentification server for the individual to input into an authenticationsession supported by the entity.

Further embodiments, features, and advantages, as well as the structureand operation of the various embodiments, are described in detail belowwith reference to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS/FIGURES

Embodiments are described with reference to the accompanying drawings.In the drawings, like reference numbers may indicate identical orfunctionally similar elements.

FIG. 1 shows an illustration of motion-based identity authenticationsystem;

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example method of securelyauthenticating an identity of an individual on the comparison ofmotion-based behavior data and previously captured motion-based behaviordata;

FIG. 3A depicts an example first traced two-dimensional symbol that iscompared to a second traced two-dimensional symbol to authenticate anindividual's identity based on motions executed by the individual intwo-dimensions;

FIG. 3B depicts an example second traced two-dimensional symbol that iscompared to a first traced two-dimensional symbol to authenticate anindividual's identity based on motions executed by the individual intwo-dimensions;

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example method of securelyauthenticating an identity of an individual based on theinter-relationship of motion-based behavior data and theinter-relationship of the previously captured motion-based behaviordata;

FIG. 5A provides an example input data matrix for the individualcompleting the trace of the pattern in a subsequent attempt to log-inand/or have their identity authenticated by the entity after completingthe initial authentication template;

FIG. 5B provides an example input data covariance matrix that is thecovariance matrix for the example input data matrix;

FIG. 5C provides an example input data eigenvector matrix that is theinput data eigenvector matrix for the input data derived from theexample input data covariance matrix;

FIG. 5D provides an example rotated input eigenvector matrix thatincludes the rotated input data from the example input data eigenvectormatrix;

FIG. 5E provides an example reference data matrix for the individualcompleting the trace of the pattern in a previous attempt to establishan authentication template and/or a previous log-in attempt;

FIG. 5F provides an example reference data covariance matrix that is thecovariance matrix for the example reference data matrix;

FIG. 5G provides an example reference data eigenvector matrix that isthe reference data eigenvector matrix for the reference data derivedfrom the example reference data covariance matrix;

FIG. 5H provides an example transpose reference data eigenvector matrixthat is the transpose of the example reference data eigenvector matrix;

FIG. 5I provides an example re-keyed input data matrix that is generatedby multiplying the example input data eigenvector matrix with thetranspose reference data eigenvector matrix;

FIG. 6A depicts an example of identity authentication of the individualbased on an independent comparison of motion-based behavior data;

FIG. 6B depicts an example of identity authentication of the individualbased on an inter-relationship comparison of motion-based behavior data;

FIG. 7 depicts an example pressure cloud configuration for identityauthentication based on pressure cloud data;

FIG. 8 depicts an example elliptical pressure cloud configuration foridentity authentication based on elliptical pressure cloud data;

FIG. 9 depicts an example force configuration for identityauthentication based on force data;

FIG. 10 depicts an example moment configuration for identityauthentication based on moment data;

FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an example method of multi-layerauthentication based on the comparison of motion-based behavior data topreviously captured motion-based behavior data; and

FIG. 12 depicts a detailed view of an exemplary motion-based identityauthentication system for authenticating an individual's identity basedon motions executed by the individual.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the Detailed Description herein, references to “one embodiment”, “anembodiment”, an “example embodiment”, etc., indicate that the embodimentdescribed may include a particular feature, structure, orcharacteristic, by every embodiment may not necessarily include theparticular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrasesare not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when aparticular feature, structure, or characteristic may be described inconnection with an embodiment, it may be submitted that it may be withinthe knowledge of one skilled in the art to affect such feature,structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodimentswhether or not explicitly described.

The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawingsthat illustrate exemplary embodiments. Other embodiments are possible,and modifications can be made to the embodiments within the spirit andscope of this description. Those skilled in the art with access to theteachings provided herein will recognize additional modifications,applications, and embodiments within the scope thereof and additionalfields in which embodiments would be of significant utility. Therefore,the detailed description is not meant to limit the embodiments describedbelow.

In an embodiment, the identity of an individual may be authenticatedbased on movements executed by an individual when tracing a pattern. Themovements that the individual executes may be based on themusculoskeletal and neurological systems of the individual which areunique to the individual and are not naturally duplicated in any otherindividual. The uniqueness of the musculoskeletal and neurologicalsystems of the individual may result in unique movements and decisionmaking processes when tracing a pattern that cannot also besubstantially duplicated by any other individual. The unique movementsand decision making processes generated by the individual when trackinga pattern generate motion-based behavior data that can be captured fromthe individual's movements and used to authenticate the identity of theindividual.

The motion-based behavior data may include data related to biometriccharacteristics of the individual which is associated with the uniquemusculoskeletal system of the individual and also behaviometriccharacteristics associated with the unique neurological system of theindividual. The biometric characteristics are related to thephysiological aspects of the individual that an individual cannotchange.

The behaviometric characteristics are related to the behavior of theindividual when the individual encounters a situation such as having tosolve a puzzle or trace a pattern. The individual may perceive wholenesswhen presented a pattern and subconsciously attempts to complete thepattern. The individual's brain may quickly and subconsciously fill ingaps to connect the pattern. The path that the individual selects tocomplete the pattern may then be quickly translated to subconsciousmovement patterns performed by the individual that are mechanicallyefficient and the most comfortable for the individual to complete thetrace of the pattern. Each time the individual traces the same pattern,some behaviometric characteristics associated with the individual'strace are similar but rarely substantially identical. However, thebehaviometric characteristics that are rarely substantially identicalwhen generated by the individual are unlikely to be substantiallyduplicated by another individual attempting to trace the same pattern asthe individual.

Even if an entity has a security breach where the individual's storedbiometric and behaviometric characteristics from previously tracedpatterns are stolen, the behaviometric characteristics should not be anidentical match to the previously captured behaviometric characteristicsfrom previously traced patterns. Some behaviometric characteristics,such as the actual path of the individual's index finger when tracingthe pattern, has a low likelihood of being substantially identical witha previously captured path of the individual's index finger. Each pathof the individual's index finger may be similar to each other but notsubstantially identical. A substantially identical path would indicatethat the individual's stored biometric and behaviometric characteristicsfrom previously traced patterns have been stolen and the identity wouldfail authentication.

The combination of the biometric and behaviometric characteristics usedfor identity authentication implements identification characteristicsthat are difficult to fraudulently obtain and/or replicate. Further, theadded security layer of some behaviometric characteristics that indicateidentity theft when substantially identical to previously capturedbehaviometric characteristics provide an additional security layer tocombat instances where the previously captured biometric andbehaviometric characteristics have been stolen. Identity authenticationbased on motions executed by the individual is also convenient for theindividual. The individual no longer has to memorize passwords and/orremember to bring a token. The individual simply needs to trace apattern.

System Overview

As shown in FIG. 1, motion-based identity authentication system 100includes a motion-based authentication communications device 110, anetwork 120, a motion-based sensor system 130, a user interface 140, amotion-based sensor server 150, and a motion-based behavior database190.

Motion-based authentication communications device 110 may be a devicethat is capable of electronically communicating with other devices whilehaving a multi-touch display. The multi-touch display has the ability torecognize the presence of two or more points in contact with the surfaceof the multi-touch display. Examples of motion-based authenticationcommunications device 110 may include a mobile telephone, a smartphone,a workstation, a portable computing device, other computing devices suchas a laptop, or a desktop computer, cluster of computers, set-top box, acomputer peripheral such as a printer, a portable audio, and/or videoplayer, a payment system, a ticketing writing system such as a parkingticketing system, a bus ticketing system, a train ticketing system or anentrance ticketing system to provide some examples, or in a ticketreading system, a toy, a game, a poster, packaging, an advertisingmaterial, a product inventory checking system and or any other suitableelectronic device with a multi-touch display that will be apparent tothose skilled in the relevant art(s) without departing from the spiritand scope of the invention.

In an embodiment, multiple modules may be implemented on the samecommunications device. Such a communications device may includesoftware, firmware, hardware, or a combination thereof. Software mayinclude one or more applications on an operating system. Hardware caninclude, but is not limited to, a processor, memory, and/or graphicaluser interface display. Motion-based authentication communicationsdevice 110 may store the motion-based behavior data captured bymotion-based sensor system 130.

An individual engaged in an identity authentication session may interactwith motion-based authentication communications device 110 via userinterface 140. User interface 140 may include a multi-touch display thathas the ability to recognize the presence of two or more points incontact with the surface of the multi-touch display. User interface 140may include any type of display device including but not limited to atouch screen display, a cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor, a liquid crystaldisplay (LCD) screen, and/or any other type of display device thatincludes a multi-touch display that will be apparent from those skilledin the relevant art(s) without departing from the spirit and scope ofthe present disclosure.

One or more motion-based sensor systems 130 may connect to one or moremotion-based authentication communications devices 110. Motion-basedsensor system 130 may include one or more sensors that capturemotion-based data that is the physical movement of an individual.Motion-based sensor system 130 may include a video imaging system, aninfrared imaging system, a photographic imaging system, an air sensingsystem, a thermal sensing system, a motion sensor that is capable ofcapturing two-dimensional data with a commercially available device suchas a Kinect motion sensing input device by Microsoft, other motionsensing systems that include sensors that are associated with amulti-touch communications device that that can also be used withoutdeparting from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.Motion-based sensor system 130 detects motion-based behavior data as theindividual executes a series of motions when continuously touching themulti-touch display of user interface 140. For example, motion-basedsensor system 130 can detect a sequence of positions the individualfollows on the multi-touch display of user interface 140 when tracing apattern displayed by user interface 140. Motion-based sensor system 130tracks the speed of the individual's movements over time as theindividual traces the pattern as well as other variables, such aslocation relative to the pattern, as is explained hereinafter.

As shown, motion-based authentication communications device 110 streamsthe motion-based behavior data to motion-based sensor server 150 vianetwork 120. Network 120 includes one or more networks, such as theInternet. In some embodiments of the present invention, network 120 mayinclude one or more wide area networks (WAN) or local area networks(LAN). Network 120 may utilize one or more network technologies such asEthernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet, virtual private network(VPN), remote VPN access, a variant of IEEE 802.11 standard such asWi-Fi, and the like. Communication over network 120 takes place usingone or more network communication protocols including reliable streamingprotocols such as transmission control protocol (TCP). These examplesare illustrative and not intended to limit the present invention.

One or more motion-based sensor servers 150 may connect to one or moremotion-based authentication communications devices 110 via network 120.Motion-based sensor servers 150 may include a data acquisition system, adata management system, intranet, conventional web-server, e-mailserver, or file transfer server modified according to one embodiment.Motion-based sensor server 150 is typically a device that includes aprocessor, a memory, and a network interface, hereinafter referred to asa computing device or simply “computer.” Motion-based sensor server 150may store the motion-based behavior data captured by motion-based sensorsystem 130.

Motion-based authentication communications device 110, motion-basedsensor server 150, and motion-based behavior data database 190 may shareresources via network 120. For example, motion-based sensor server 150may retrieve previously captured motion-based behavior data from themotions generated by the individual during previous identityauthentication sessions via network 120. Motion-based authenticationcommunications device 110 may also provide motion-based behavior datacaptured from the individual when tracing the pattern during eachidentity authentication session via network 120. Based on the cloudcomputing configuration, the interaction between motion-basedauthentication communications device 110, motion-based sensor server150, and motion-based behavior data database 190 may not be limited to asingle computing device. For example, a plurality of computing devicesmay update motion-based behavior data database 190 via network 120 withcaptured motion-based behavior data.

Motion-Based Identity Authentication

Motion-based authentication communications device 110 may authenticatethe identity of the individual based on motion-based behavior datacaptured by motion-based authentication communications device 110 as theindividual traces the pattern. An embodiment consistent with theinvention compares the captured motion-based behavior data to previouslycaptured motion-based behavior data that was previously captured bymotion-based authentication communications device 110 from theindividual during a previous log-in and/or authentication attempt. Basedon the comparison, motion-based authentication communications device 110determines whether to authenticate the identity of the individual orreject the identity authentication of the individual.

One such implementation of authenticating the identity of the individualbased on the comparison of motion-based behavior data to previouslycaptured motion-based behavior data is illustrated by process 200 inFIG. 2. Process 200 includes seven primary steps: prompt the individual210, receive a traced pattern 220, capture motion-based behavior data230, store captured motion-based behavior data 240, compare motion-basedbehavior data with previously captured motion-based behavior data 250,authenticate the identity of the individual 260, and reject the identityauthentication of the individual 270. Steps 210-270 are typicallyimplemented in a computer, e.g., via software and/or hardware, e.g.,motion-based authentication communications device 110 of FIG. 1.

In step 210, the individual may be prompted with an authenticationtemplate that includes the pattern for the individual to trace via userinterface 140 with a plurality of motions executed by the individual.The individual may be any person who is engaged with an identityauthentication session that is required by an entity so that theindividual may then participate in activities supported by the entityafter the identity of the individual is authenticated. The entity may beany organization that provides services to the individual, such as abank, and/or receives services from the individual, such as theindividual's employer, that requires the individual's identity beauthenticated to prevent breaches of security of the entity and/or ofthe individual. The pattern that the individual is required to traceduring the identity authentication session may be a series of pointsand/or continuous paths displayed to the individual via user interface140. The individual may be requested to continuously trace the patternfrom an initial point defined on the pattern to an end point defined onthe pattern via user interface 140 in order to have the identity of theindividual authenticated. The pattern may be a two-dimension patternwhere the individual traces the pattern via user interface 140 intwo-dimensional space.

In an embodiment, the individual may be initially provided theauthentication template via the multi-touch display of user interface140 when the individual is initially signing up for the identityauthentication required by the entity. For example, the individual isinitially provided the authentication template when the individual isinitially enrolling as a customer of a bank. Each future identificationauthentication session engaged by the individual may be compared to theinitial authentication template provided to the individual during theinitial enrollment session. The individual may be provided theauthentication template via the multi-touch display of user interface140 for each authentication session that the individual engages. Eachadditional authentication template provided to the individual mayinclude a substantially similar pattern as the pattern provided in theinitial authentication template during the sign-up stage for theindividual. Each additional authentication template provided to theindividual may be compared to the initial authentication template.

In an embodiment, user interface 140 may display the pattern included inthe authentication template for the individual to trace via themulti-touch display. In another embodiment, user interface 140 may alsoaudibly announce to the individual the pattern included in theauthentication template that the individual is to trace via themulti-touch display. The individual may be prompted with the pattern totrace with any other method that adequately identifies to the individualof the pattern that the individual is to trace that will be apparent tothose skilled in the relevant art(s) without departing from the spiritand scope of the present disclosure. In an example embodiment, step 210may be performed by prompting module 1270 as shown in FIG. 12.

After the authentication template is displayed to the individual viauser interface 140, in step 220, a traced pattern generated as theindividual traces the pattern displayed by user interface 140 via themulti-touch display may be received. The traced pattern may be receivedas the individual executes the plurality of motions to continuouslytrace the pattern from an initial point to an end point via themulti-touch display of user interface 140. The individual decides tobegin the trace of the pattern at an initial point on the pattern andthen continues to trace the pattern by following a path along thepattern until the pattern is traced completing the pattern at an endpoint.

In an embodiment, the initial point and the end point may be atdifferent locations on the pattern. In another embodiment, the initialpoint and the end point may be at substantially similar locations on thepattern where the individual begins and ends the trace in substantiallysimilar locations on the pattern. The individual traces the pattern bycontinuously maintaining contact with the multi-touch display of userinterface 140 from the initial point to the end point. The continuouslytraced pattern may be received via user interface 140 as the individualtraces the pattern from the initial point to the end point. In anexample embodiment, step 220 may be performed by transceiver 1220 asshown in FIG. 12.

In step 230, motion-based behavior data that may be generated by theplurality of motions executed by the individual when continuouslytracing the pattern may be captured. Motion capturing sensors includedin motion-based sensor system 130 may capture the motion-based behaviordata as the individual executes the plurality of motions when tracingthe pattern. The motion-based behavior data includes data that is uniqueto the individual when tracing the pattern with the plurality ofmotions.

Motion-based sensor system 130 may be coupled to the multi-touch displayof user interface 140 so that motion-based sensor system 130 may capturethe motion-based behavior data generated as the individual engages thepattern by maintaining contact with the multi-touch display. Theindividual may also be within proximity of the multi-touch display sothat the motion capturing sensors included in motion-based sensor system130 that are coupled to the multi-touch display can adequately capturethe motion-based behavior data generated from the plurality of motionsexecuted by the individual when tracing the pattern via the multi-touchdisplay. Motion-based sensor system 130 may continuously capture themotion-based behavior data beginning with the initial point of theindividual's continuous trace through the end point of the individual'strace of the pattern. The plurality of motions executed by theindividual that generate the motion-based behavior data may include anybodily motion and/or relation between bodily motions that occur as theindividual traces the pattern. The motion-based behavior data mayinclude any data generated from the plurality of motions as theindividual traces the pattern that is unique to the individual. Themotion-based behavior data may be data that is relative to themusculoskeletal and neurological systems unique to the individual andcannot be substantially duplicated by an imposter tracing asubstantially similar pattern as the individual.

The motion-based behavior data may include but is not limited to theinitial point and end point selected by the individual to begin andcomplete the trace of the pattern, the amount of time taken by theindividual to complete the trace of the pattern, the coordinates of thetrace relative to the pattern, the velocities in completing the trace ofthe pattern, the relative phase of between x-coordinates andy-coordinates of the trace relative to the pattern, finger lengthratios, phalanx to metacarpal ratio for each finger, positions of eachhand throughout the movement of the trace, positions of each fingerthroughout the movement of the trace, the sequence of the pointsconnected during the trace, the sequence of the continuous path that isfollowed during the trace, the limbs involved in the movement, the speedof the movement for each axes of motion, the position of the limbengaged with the trace over time for each axes of motion, wrist angleover time, angular position of the wrist over time, angular velocity ofthe wrist over time, ratio of height, arm length, leg length, upper armto forearm ratio, relative position of hands during movement, relativeposition of elbows during movement, relative position of shouldersduring movement, the pressure applied to the multi-touch display of userinterface 140 by the individual as the individual completes the traceand/or any other motion-based behavior data generated by the pluralityof motions executed by the individual when tracing the pattern that isunique to the individual that will be apparent to those skilled in therelevant art(s) without departing from the spirit and scope of thepresent disclosure.

For example, the individual may be prompted with an authenticationtemplate that includes a two-dimensional symbol for the individual totrace. The individual begins to trace the two-dimensional symbol withselecting a point on the symbol as the initial point of the trace. Theindividual begins the trace using their index finger and then continuesto trace by following the path of the symbol with their index finger.The motion-based behavior data is captured. In this example, thecaptured motion-based behavior data is the amount of time taken by theindividual to complete the trace of the two-dimensional symbol as theindividual begins the trace with the initial point and completes thetrace with the end point. The amount of time taken by the individual tocomplete the trace is captured from the sensors coupled to themulti-touch display of user interface 140 included in motion-basedsensor system 130.

The amount of time taken by the individual to complete the trace of thetwo-dimensional symbol is unique to the individual. An imposterattempting to impersonate the individual when engaged in theauthentication session would not be able to duplicate the amount of timetaken by the individual to complete the trace of the two-dimensionalsymbol. Assuming the imposter successfully selects the initial pointlocated on the two-dimensional symbol as the individual to begin thetrace and then successfully follows the same sequence when completingthe trace and successfully selects to do the trace with their indexfinger, the imposter would still not be able to substantially duplicatethe amount of time taken by the individual to complete the trace. Theindividual subconsciously completes the trace in the time period that iscomfortable and efficient so that the individual can most efficientlycomplete the pattern. The amount of time taken by the individual tocomplete the trace of the two-dimensional symbol is based on themusculoskeletal and neurological systems unique to the individual andcannot be duplicated by an imposter having a different musculoskeletaland neurological system. Thus, adding security to the identityauthentication session. In an example embodiment, step 230 may beperformed by capturing module 1240 as shown in FIG. 12.

After the motion-based behavior data generated by the plurality ofmotions executed by the individual when tracing the pattern is captured,in step 240, the captured motion-based behavior data is stored inmotion-based behavior data database 190. The captured motion-basedbehavior data is stored in motion-based behavior data database 190 asassociated with the authentication of the identity of the individual.The captured motion-based behavior data associated with the individualas stored in motion-based behavior data database 190 may then bereferenced for the identity authentication of the individual in futureauthentication sessions. In an example embodiment, step 240 may beperformed by storing module 1260 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 250, the motion-based behavior data may be compared withpreviously captured motion-based behavior data. The previously capturedmotion-based behavior data associated with the individual may be storedin motion-based behavior data database 190. The previously capturedmotion-based behavior data may be captured from a pattern previouslytraced by the individual during a previous authentication session.

Each time the individual engages an authentication session for aspecific entity, the individual may be prompted to trace the patternprovided in the authentication template. Each time the individual tracesthe pattern for each authentication session, the motion-based behaviordata generated by each trace may be stored in motion-based behavior datadatabase 190 as associated with the individual. As a result,motion-based behavior data database 190 continues to accumulatemotion-based behavior data associated with the individual each time theindividual engages in the authentication session and traces the pattern.The motion-based behavior data generated from the present trace of thepattern for the present authentication session may be compared to thepreviously captured motion-based behavior data accumulated in themotion-based behavior data database 190. Thus, the comparing may not belimited to simply comparing motion-based behavior data to themotion-based behavior data captured during the initial sign-up sessionrequired by the entity but rather to the motion-based behavior datacaptured for each authentication session.

For example, a video display screen shows an image of a two-dimensionalsymbol for the individual to trace each time the individual engages inthe authentication session. Each time the individual completes the traceof the two-dimensional symbol, the sequence traced by the individual isstored in motion-based behavior data database 190. During the presentauthentication session, the individual begins to trace thetwo-dimensional symbol by selecting an initial point located on thetwo-dimensional symbol then follows a sequence in completing the tracewith an end point. Various data are captured, such as the sequencefollowed, when completing the trace. This data is compared withpreviously stored data.

The motion-based behavior data captured each time the individualcompletes the trace of the pattern may be normalized using aninterpolation technique. Each time the individual completes the trace ofthe pattern the individual may take a different amount of time tocomplete the trace of the pattern. For example, using time as theauthentication data, the individual may take 8 seconds the first timethe individual completes the trace of the pattern, the individual maythen take 5 seconds the second time, and the individual may take 10seconds the third time.

An interpolation technique may be implemented to normalize themotion-based behavior data captured during the first, second, and thirdtimes the individual completed the trace of the pattern. The individualmay be interpolated to be at a substantially similar location in thesequence of completing the trace relative to the amount of sequencecompleted. For example, a first location of the trace of the pattern maybe interpolated to be when having 60% of the trace completed. Themotion-based behavior data captured at the first location for eachcompleted trace may then be normalized to being 60% completed with thetrace rather than the amount of time taken to reach each location foreach completed trace. In an example embodiment, step 250 may beperformed by comparing module 1280 as shown in FIG. 12.

After step 250 is completed, the identity of the individual may beauthenticated or rejected. Step 260 is performed when the identity ofthe individual is authenticated. The identity of the individual may beauthenticated when the motion-based behavior data is within a thresholdof the previously captured motion-based behavior data. As noted above,the motion-based behavior data generated by the plurality of motionsexecuted by the individual when tracing the pattern are unique to theindividual based on the unique musculoskeletal and neurological systemsof the individual. An imposter who attempts to trace the same patternmay not generate motion-based behavior data similar to the individual.

However, certain motion-based behavior data generated by the individualalso should not be substantially identical each time the individualtraces the pattern. A slight variation in certain motion-based behaviordata should occur each time the individual traces the pattern. Thus, theidentity of the individual may be authenticated when the motion-basedbehavior data is within a threshold of previously captured motion-basedbehavior data. The threshold may be determined so that the threshold maybe sufficiently wide to account for the slight variation in motion-basedbehavior data that occurs each time the individual traces the pattern sothat that the identity of the individual is properly authenticated. Thethreshold may be determined so that the threshold also may besufficiently tight so that any significant variation in motion-basedbehavior data that likely signifies an imposter attempting toimpersonate the individual would not be authenticated.

For example, each time the individual traces the two-dimensional symbolwith their index finger, the movement speed and position of theindividual's index finger as the individual traces the two-dimensionalsymbol is captured. The movement speed of the individual's index fingervaries throughout the trace of the two-dimensional symbol. The movementspeed of the individual's index finger is faster when connecting a firstlocation on the two-dimensional symbol to a second location on thetwo-dimensional symbol than the movement speed of the individual's indexfinger when connecting the second location to a third location on thetwo-dimensional symbol.

Further, there is a low likelihood that the movement speed and positionof the individual's index finger will be substantially identical to aprevious tracing of the dots. There should be a slight variation in themovement speed and position of the individual's index finger each timethe individual completes the trace of the dots. There is also a lowlikelihood that an unauthorized individual when completing the samepattern of dots will have a movement speed and position of theunauthorized individual's index finger within the threshold variation ofthe individual's movement speed and position. There is a high likelihoodthat the unauthorized individual's movement speed and position of theunauthorized individual's second index finger may be significantlydifferent (i.e., outside the threshold) from the movement speed andposition of the individual's index finger.

The present movement speed and position of the individual's index fingerwhen tracing the pattern for the current authentication session is thencompared to each movement speed and position previously captured foreach previous authentication session completed by the individual asstored in motion-based behavior data database 190. In order toauthenticate the identity of the individual, the present movement speedand position is to be within, for example, a +/−5% threshold of thepreviously captured movement speed. The present movement speed andposition exceeds the previously captured movement speed and position by4.5%. The identity of the individual is authenticated because thepresent movement speed and position is within the +/−5% threshold of thepreviously captured movement speed and position.

The threshold used to authenticate the identity of the individual may becustomized for each motion-based behavior data. As noted above, themotion-based behavior data may be broken down to data associated withbiometric characteristics and/or behaviometric characteristics of theindividual. The biometric characteristics are related to themusculoskeletal system of the individual and may have little variationif any each time the individual traces the pattern but are not likely tobe replicated by an imposter due to the uniqueness of themusculoskeletal system of the individual. The behaviometriccharacteristics are related to the neurological system of the individualand may have a slight variation each time the individual traces thepattern with little likelihood of being substantially identical toprevious behaviometric characteristics generated during previous tracesof the pattern. Further, an unauthorized individual may have a lowlikelihood of generating behaviometric characteristics within thethreshold variation of the individual when tracing the same patterndespite the slight variation associated with such behaviometriccharacteristics. The behaviometric characteristics may also besubstantially identical to previous behaviometric characteristicsgenerated during previous traces of the pattern, such as the sequencetraced. Thus, the threshold associated with each motion-based behaviordata may be customized to account for the little if any variationassociated with biometric characteristics and the slight variation thatmay be associated with specific behaviometric characteristics.

For example, the ratio of height, arm length, and leg length capturedfrom the individual as the individual traces the pattern is motion-basedbehavior data that is classified as biometric data and may have littleif any variation each time the individual traces the pattern. The ratioof height, arm length, and leg length is a ratio that relates theindividual's overall height to the individual's arm length to theindividual's leg length. There is a low likelihood that this ratio mayvary each time the individual completes the pattern yet there is also alow likelihood that an unauthorized individual may be able to provide aratio within the threshold variation based on the uniqueness of themusculoskeletal system to the individual. Thus, the threshold associatedwith the ratio of height, arm length, and leg length may be tight due tothe low likelihood of variation for the individual and is set at +/−2%.

In another example, the relative phase between x-coordinates andy-coordinates relative to the two-dimensional symbol as the individualtraces the pattern is motion-based behavior data that is classified asbehaviometric data and may have slight variation each time theindividual traces the pattern and may have a low likelihood of beingsubstantially identical. There is a high likelihood that the relativephase between x-coordinates and y-coordinates of the traced pattern mayslightly vary each time the individual completes the pattern yet thereis a low likelihood that an unauthorized individual may be able to havea relative phase of x-coordinates and y-coordinates of the tracedpattern within the threshold variation of the individual's tracedpattern based on the uniqueness of the neurological system to theindividual. Thus, the threshold associated with the relative phase ofx-coordinates and y-coordinates of the traced pattern by the individualmay be sufficiently wide to allow for the slight variation each time theindividual completes the trace yet sufficiently tight to exclude anattempt by an imposter and is set at +/−5%.

In another example, the sequence followed by the individual as theindividual traces the pattern is motion-based behavior data that isclassified as behaviometric data but may not have a slight variationeach time the individual traces the pattern. The sequence selected bythe individual to trace the pattern may be substantially identical eachtime the individual traces the pattern. For example, the individualselects a substantially similar initial point located on the pattern tobegin the trace, selects a substantially similar end point to end thetrace, and follows a substantially similar sequence in tracing thepattern from the initial point to the end point. Thus, the thresholdassociated with the sequence is set at 100%. Other examples ofthresholds include the amount of time taken to complete the trace is setat +/−5%, the range of x-coordinates and the y-coordinates followed incompleting the trace is set at +/−5%, the range of velocities relativeto different locations on the trace is set +/−5%, the relative phase ofx-coordinates and y-coordinates is set at +/−5%, and/or any otherthreshold that is sufficient to authenticate an individual that will beapparent to those skilled in the relevant art(s) without departing fromthe spirit and scope of the present disclosure. In an exampleembodiment, step 260 may be performed by authentication module 1230 asshown in FIG. 12.

Step 270 is performed when the identity of the individual is rejected.The authentication of the identity of the individual is rejected whenthe motion-based behavior data is outside the threshold of thepreviously captured motion-based behavior data. The authentication ofthe identity of the individual is also rejected when the motion-basedbehavior data that has been designated as requiring a slight variationis substantially identical to the previously captured motion-basedbehavior data.

As noted above, a customized threshold may be designated to eachmotion-based behavior data. The authentication of the identity may berejected when any of the motion-based behavior data when compared to therespective previously captured motion-based behavior data is outside ofthe respective customized thresholds. Any of the motion-based behaviordata that is outside of the respective customized thresholds whencompared to the respective previously captured motion-based behaviordata may signify that the attempt for identity authentication is notbeing completed by the actual individual resulting in a rejection of theauthentication.

For example, each time the individual traces the two-dimensional symbol,data that includes the individual using their ring finger to completethe trace is captured and is stored in motion-based behavior datadatabase 190. An imposter attempting to log-in as the individualattempts to complete an authentication session. The imposter is promptedwith the same two-dimensional symbol presented to the individual foreach authentication session. The imposter traces the two-dimensionalsymbol with their index finger rather than their ring finger. The use ofthe index finger is compared to the previous uses of the ring fingerstored in motion-based behavior data database 190. The thresholddetermined for using the ring finger in completing the trace is 100%.The imposter failed to use the ring finger but rather used the indexfinger. Due to the 100% threshold, the identity authentication of theimposter is rejected.

The authentication of the identity may also be rejected when any of themotion-based behavior data when compared to the respective previouslycaptured motion-based behavior data is substantially identical to thepreviously captured motion-based behavior data captured from any of theprevious authentication sessions. Any of the motion-based behavior datathat is substantially identical to the respective previously capturedmotion-based behavior data may signify that the attempt for identityauthentication is not being completed by the actual individual resultingin a rejection of the authentication.

For example, the individual is prompted with an authentication templatethat includes a two-dimensional pattern of squares highlighted in a gridof squares for the individual to trace each time the individual engagesin the authentication session. Each time the individual traces thepattern of dots with their index finger, the x-coordinates and they-coordinates traced by the individual's index finger on the multi-touchdisplay of user interface 140 is captured. The x-coordinates and they-coordinates traced by the individual's index finger is unique to themusculoskeletal and neurological systems of the individual as theindividual examines the pattern of dots and determines the mostefficient path to complete the trace of the pattern of dots. There is alow likelihood that the individual may trace substantially identicalx-coordinates and y-coordinates on the multi-touch display whenconnecting the dots as compared to any previously captured tracedx-coordinates and y-coordinates during previous authentication sessions.Rather, there may be a slight variation in the x-coordinates andy-coordinates traced on the multi-touch display each time the individualcompletes the trace of the dots but within a threshold of each previoustrace.

An imposter when following the same sequence of squares in completingthe trace as the individual with their index finger may also have a lowlikelihood of following x-coordinates and y-coordinates within thethreshold variation due to the uniqueness of the musculoskeletal andneurological systems of the individual. As noted above, the likelihoodof even the individual providing a substantially identical trace ofx-coordinates and y-coordinates as compared to previous traces of theindividual is low. As a result, any substantially identical traces ofx-coordinates and y-coordinates that are received may indicate a highlikelihood that an imposter attempting to impersonate the individual hasbreached the security of the entity and stolen the x-coordinates andy-coordinates of a previous trace completed by the individual from aprevious authentication session. There is also a high likelihood thatthe imposter is presently attempting to log-in as the individual usingthe stolen x-coordinates and y-coordinates in completing a trace of thepattern. Thus, due to the substantial identical aspects of thex-coordinates and y-coordinates in completing the trace of the patternthat is received during the present authentication session to previouslycaptured x-coordinates and y-coordinates, the identity authentication ofthe imposter is rejected. In an example embodiment, step 270 may beperformed by rejection module 1250 as shown in FIG. 12.

Two-Dimension Motion-Based Identity Authentication

As shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, an example first traced two-dimensionalsymbol 300 and a second traced two-dimensional symbol 375 that arecompared to authenticate an individual's identity based on motionsexecuted by the individual in two-dimensions is depicted. First tracedtwo-dimensional symbol 310 includes a first pattern 320 that is tracedby a first trace 330. First trace 330 includes an initial point 305, anend point 370, high velocity points 350(a-h), a high pressure point 340a, a low pressure point 340 b, a first location 360 a, a second location360 b, and a third location 360 c. Second traced two-dimensional symbol375 includes an authentication template 380 that is traced by a secondtrace 390. Second trace 390 includes an initial point 315, an end point325, a first location 395, a low pressure point 335 a, and a highpressure point 335 b.

A first individual requests to complete an authentication template sothat the first individual may log-in to the first individual's bankaccount via the first individual's motion-based authenticationcommunications device, such as motion-based authenticationcommunications device 110. The first individual is prompted withuncompleted pattern 320 via the multi-touch display of user interface140. The uncompleted authentication template may be a randomly generatedtwo-dimensional symbol, such as the symbol β. The individual may berequested to trace pattern 320 in whatever way the individual feelscomfortable and in whatever sequence the individual prefers. The firstindividual may complete the trace of pattern 320 with the right hand,the left hand, a combination of the right and left hand, a right indexfinger, a left thumb, a combination of right fingers, a combination ofleft fingers, a combination of right fingers and left fingers, and/orany other appendage or combination of appendages used by the individualto complete the trace of pattern 320 that will be apparent to thoseskilled in the relevant art(s) without departing from the spirit andscope of the present disclosure.

The first individual may then select to trace pattern 320 with the firstindividual's left index finger. The first individual may initiate thetrace of pattern 320 with initial point 305 as the initial point of thetrace. The individual may then create trace 330 by tracingauthentication template beginning with initial point 305 and completingthe trace with end point 370 as the end point of the trace.

The motion-based behavior data that is obtained by the sensors coupledto the multi-touch display of motion-based sensor system 130 as thefirst individual completes trace 330 is captured. The first individualbeginning their trace 330 with initial point 305 is captured. Thex-coordinates and y-coordinates of the multi-touch display relative topattern 320 as the first individual completes trace 330 are alsocaptured. A time stamp is associated with each x-coordinate andy-coordinate captured during the completion of trace 330. For example,the time may begin when the first individual touches the multi-touchdisplay at initial point 305 so that the first time stamp associatedwith initial point 305 is the earliest time stamp. A time stamp is thenassociated with each following x-coordinate and y-coordinate in thesequence of the first individual completing trace 330 so that the timestamp associated with end point 325 is the latest time stamp. The firstindividual completing trace 330 with end point 370 is also captured.

High velocity points 350(a-h) where the velocity of the firstindividual's left index finger reached a high velocity relative to thevelocities of the first individual's left index finger at otherlocations of first trace 330 are also captured. For example, thevelocity of the first individual's left index finger is higher at highvelocity point 350 a than at initial point 305. In another example,capturing module 240 captures the pressure that the first individualapplies to the multi-touch display of user interface 140 as the firstindividual completes trace 330. In such an example, the pressure appliedby the first individual is higher at high pressure point 340 a than atlow pressure point 340 b the motion-based behavior data captured bycapturing module 240 in motion-based behavior data database 190.

A second individual that is attempting to fraudulently gain access tothe first individual's bank account requests to complete anauthentication template so that the imposter may log-in to the firstindividual's bank account via the imposter's motion-based authenticationcommunications device, such as motion-based authenticationcommunications device 110. The imposter is prompted with uncompletedauthentication template 380 via the multi-touch display of userinterface 140. The uncompleted authentication template is the symbol 13that had previously been traced by the first individual.

The imposter may be requested to trace authentication template 380 inwhatever way the imposter feels comfortable and in whatever sequence theindividual prefers. In an attempt to duplicate the trace ofauthentication template 380 similar to that of the first individual'strace of pattern 320, the imposter selects to trace authenticationtemplate 380 with the imposter's left index finger. However, theimposter may view authentication template 380 differently than the firstindividual viewed pattern 320 and may determine a different approach incompleting the trace of authentication template 380 as compared to howthe first individual completed pattern 320. The imposter may initiatethe trace of authentication template 380 with initial point 315 as theinitial point of the trace which is in a different location onauthentication template 380 as compared to initial point 305 that thefirst individual began the trace of pattern 320. The imposter may thencreate trace 390 by tracing authentication template beginning withinitial point 315 and completing the trace with end point 325 as the endpoint of the trace which is also in a different location onauthentication template 380 as compared to end point 370 that the firstindividual ended the trace of pattern 320.

The motion-based behavior data that is obtained by the sensors coupledto the multi-touch display of motion-based sensor system 130 as theimposter completes trace 390 is captured. The imposter initiated trace390 with initial point 315 is captured. The x-coordinates andy-coordinates of the multi-touch display relative to authenticationtemplate 380 as the individual completes trace 390 are captured. A timestamp is associated with each x-coordinate and y-coordinate capturedduring the completion of trace 390. For example, the time may begin whenthe imposter touches the multi-touch display at initial point 315 sothat the first time stamp associated with initial point 315 is theearliest time stamp. Time stamps may be associated with each followingx-coordinate and y-coordinate in the sequence of the first individualcompleting trace 390 so that the time stamp associated with end point325 is the latest time stamp. The first individual completing trace 390with end point 325 is also captured.

Constant velocities where the velocity of the imposter's left indexfinger maintained constant velocities when completing trace 390 ratherthan accelerating and decelerating throughout the trace is alsocaptured. In another example, the pressure that the imposter applies tothe multi-touch display of user interface 140 as the imposter completestrace 390 is also captured. In such an example, the pressure applied bythe imposter is higher at high pressure point 335 b than at low pressurepoint 335 a. The captured motion-based behavior data is stored inmotion-based behavior data database 190.

The motion-based behavior data captured when the first individualcompleted trace 330 is compared to the motion-based behavior datacaptured when the imposter completed trace 390. Initial point 305 andend point 370 of trace 330 completed by the first individual is comparedto initial point 315 and end point 325 of trace 390 completed by theimposter. As noted above, the sequence followed when completing thetrace may be a behaviometric characteristic that may not have a slightvariation each time an individual traces the pattern so that thethreshold set for following the sequence may be 100%. Initial point 305and end point 370 of trace 330 completed by the first individual isdifferent from initial point 315 and end point 325 completed by theimposter. Thus, the identity authentication of the imposter is rejected.

Assuming that the imposter did properly select the initial point and endpoint of trace 390 to be substantially similar to initial point 305 andend point 370 of trace 330 completed by the first individual, there areseveral other layers of data authentication that may occur. The totaltime to complete trace 330 by the first individual is compared with thetotal time that the imposter took to complete trace 390. As noted above,the total time to complete the trace may be a behaviormetriccharacteristic that may have a slight variation each time an individualtraces the pattern so that the threshold set for the total time incompleting the trace may be +/−5%. The smoothness of trace 390 completedby the imposter as compared to high velocity points 350(a-h) shown intrace 330 completed by the first individual indicates that the firstindividual completed trace 330 in a much shorter time period than theimposter completed trace 390. Thus, the total time in the impostercompleting trace 390 is more than 5% longer than the total time in thefirst individual completing trace 330 so that the identityauthentication of the imposter is rejected.

The velocity of an individual's trace at each x-coordinate andy-coordinate of the trace is also compared. As noted above, the velocityof an individual's trace at each x-coordinate and y-coordinate may havea slight variation each time an individual traces the pattern so thatthe threshold set for each measured velocity may be +/−5%. Trace 390completed by the imposter that does not include any high velocity points350(a-h) that trace 330 completed by the first individual. Thex-coordinates and y-coordinates associated with each high velocity point350(a-h) may have significantly higher velocities in trace 330 completedby the first individual than velocities corresponding to similarx-coordinates and y-coordinates in trace 390 completed by the imposter.Thus, high velocity points 350(a-h) are greater than 5% of thevelocities associated with similar x-coordinates and y-coordinates intrace 390 so that the identity authentication of the imposter isrejected.

The x-coordinates and y-coordinates on the multi-touch display of userinterface 140 for an individual's trace may also be compared. As notedabove, the x-coordinates and y-coordinates on the multi-touch displaymay have a slight variation each time an individual traces the patternso that the threshold set for each x-coordinate and y-coordinate may be+/−5%. Trace 330 completed by the first individual includes firstlocation 360 a, second location 360 b, and third location 360 c. As thefirst individual completed trace 330, the first individual linked firstlocation 360 a and third location 360 c with second location 360 b.However, trace 390 completed by the imposter includes initial point 315and first location 395. As the imposter completed trace 390, theimposter failed to link first location 395 with initial point 315 as thefirst individual did with second location 360 b. As a result,x-coordinates and y-coordinates in trace 390 that are not similar tox-coordinates and y-coordinates associated with second location 360 b intrace 330. Thus, x-coordinates and y-coordinates in trace 390 are beyond+/−5% of the x-coordinates and y-coordinates in trace 330 so that theidentity authentication of the imposter is rejected.

An Exemplary Authentication Technique Using Motion-Based Behavior Data

As discussed in detail above, motion-based authentication communicationsdevice 110 may authenticate the identity of the individual based onmotion-based behavior data captured by motion-based authenticationcommunications device 110 as the individual traces the pattern. Asdiscussed in detail above, an embodiment consistent with the inventioncompares the captured motion-based behavior data to previously capturedmotion-based behavior data that was previously captured by motion-basedauthentication communications device 110 from the individual during aprevious log-in and/or authentication attempt.

An exemplary authentication technique according to embodiments of thepresent invention using motion-based behavior data to be discussed infurther detail below regarding the identity authentication of theindividual is based on an inter-relationship of each motion-basedbehavior data. The inter-relationship of the data determines how eachindividual piece of data impacts each other piece of data captured fromthe trace.

For example, the inter-relationship of the velocity and thex-coordinates and y-coordinates from the trace includes how the velocityof the trace impacts the x-coordinates and y-coordinates of the trace.If an individual maintains a high velocity throughout the trace, thex-coordinates and y-coordinates of the trace may have less accuracyrelative to the pattern in that a higher quantity of the x-coordinatesand y-coordinates of the trace may be located outside of the pattern. Ifan individual maintains a low velocity throughout the trace, thequantity of x-coordinates and y-coordinates of the trace may be morealigned with the pattern. The inter-related motion-based behavior datawith the inter-related previously captured motion-based behavior datamay then be compared to each other.

For example, the impact of the velocity on the x-coordinates andy-coordinates captured from the current trace may be compared to theimpact of the velocity on the x-coordinates and y-coordinates capturedfrom the previous trace. Thus, the identity authentication of theindividual based on the inter-relationship of each piece of motion-basedbehavior data provides an additional layer of authentication. Animpostor attempting to log-in as the individual would not only have totrace the pattern so that each piece of motion-based behavior data fallswithin the threshold to be authenticated, but would also have to have asimilar inter-relationship between each piece of motion-based behaviordata to successfully log-in as the individual.

One such implementation of authenticating the identity of the individualbased on the inter-relationship of motion-based behavior data and theinter-relationship of the previously captured motion-based behavior datais illustrated by process 400 in FIG. 4. Process 400 includes eightprimary steps: receive input data 410, generate input eigenvector matrix420, rotate input eigenvector matrix 430, receive reference data 440,generate reference eigenvector matrix 450, generate re-keyed input data460, compare individual variables 470, and authenticate with a scoringsystem 480, each of which will be discussed in greater detail below.Steps 410-480 are typically implemented in a computer, e.g., viasoftware and/or hardware, e.g., motion-based authenticationcommunications device 110 of FIG. 1.

In step 410, input data may be received as the individual completes thetrace of the pattern when attempting to have their identityauthenticated. Step 410 has been discussed in detail above relative tothe capturing of input data where the input data is the motion-basedbehavior data captured during subsequent identification sessions afterthe individual has initially completed the authentication template. Theindividual initially completes the authentication template wheninitially signing up for the identity authentication required by theentity. The individual then completes the authentication template eachsubsequent time the individual attempts to log-in and/or have theiridentity authenticated by the identity which is when the motion-basedbehavior data is generated.

For ease of discussion, motion-based behavior data captured as theindividual completes a subsequent trace after completing the initialauthentication template will be referred to as input data. Each instancethat the individual attempts to have their identity authenticated bytracing the pattern, the time the individual takes to complete thepattern may vary. As noted above, a threshold may be assigned to thetime taken for the individual to complete the trace, such as +/−5%. As aresult, comparing the input data based on the time required to completeeach trace may distort the comparison. The amount of time required bythe individual to reach each x-coordinate and y-coordinate on the traceof the pattern may be different for each trace completed by theindividual.

For example, the individual may take 1 second to complete the trace whencompleting the initial authentication template and then take 1.25seconds to complete a subsequent trace. Comparing the input data at theend point of the initial trace that took 1 second to complete to theinput data at the end point of the subsequent trace that took 1.25seconds may be distorted and not provide an accurate comparison toauthenticate the identity of the individual. As a result, the input datamay be normalized relative to the transition of the movement by theindividual in completing the trace from 0%-100% rather than a timeperiod to complete the trace. The input data relative to where in thetrace that the input data was captured may provide a more accuratecomparison to where in the trace that the previously captured data wascaptured.

FIG. 5A provides an example input data matrix 510 for the individualcompleting the trace of the pattern in a subsequent attempt to log-inand/or have their identity authenticated by the entity after completingthe initial authentication template. For this example, the individual iscompleting a trace of the β pattern shown in FIG. 3 which is shown assubsequent trace 605 in FIG. 6A. Subsequent trace 605 includes initialpoint 610 a, second point 615 a, third point 620 a, fourth point 625 a,and end point 630 a. As noted above, the pattern may include any type ofpattern that may be traced to provide motion-based behavior data thatwill be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art(s) withoutdeparting from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Further for this example, the input data includes the x-coordinateposition on the β pattern, the y-coordinate position on theβ pattern andthe velocity relative to each x-coordinate position and y-coordinateposition in completing the trace of the β pattern. Although this exampleprovides three examples of input data for simplicity, any quantity ofmotion-based behavior data listed above may be used in a similar fashionas the following example will explain to authenticate the identity ofthe individual based on the inter-relationship of the motion-basedbehavior data that will be apparent to those skilled in the relevantart(s) without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Further for this example, the values provided by example input datamatrix 510 represent the x-coordinate position, y-coordinate position,and the velocity for five different points along the subsequent trace605 of the β pattern. The first row is the x-coordinate position,y-coordinate position and velocity at the initial point 610 a of thesubsequent trace 605 of the β pattern and the last row is thex-coordinate position, y-coordinate position and the velocity at the endpoint 630 a of the subsequent trace 605. The second, third, and fourthrows are the x-coordinate positions, y-coordinate positions, andvelocities at three other sequential points 615 a, 620 a, and 625 aalong the subsequent trace 605. Although this example provides fivepositions along the trace of the β pattern where the x-coordinatepositions, y-coordinate positions, and velocities that were capturedduring the trace for simplicity, any quantity of positions along thetrace of the β pattern may be used for the corresponding input data toauthenticate the identity of the individual that will be apparent tothose skilled in the relevant art(s) without departing from the spiritand scope of the invention.

The x-coordinate position, the y-coordinate position, and the velocitycaptured from the trace corresponds to initial point 610 a, second point615 a, third point 620 a, fourth point 625 a and end point 630 a onsubsequent trace 605. For example, the x-coordinate position and they-coordinate position as provided in the first row of example input datamatrix 510 provide the values of 1 and 1, respectively, which signifiesthat the x-coordinate position and the y-coordinate position relative toeach other are in the same initial location (initial point 610 a) ofsubsequent trace 605. However, the x-coordinate position at second point615 a is 2 while the y-coordinate position at second point 615 a is 5due to the individual choosing to trace the β pattern by going from thebottom of the tail of the β pattern (initial point 610 a) to the top ofthe β pattern (second point 615 a) of subsequent trace 605.

The velocity value of 5 at initial point 610 a and then the decrease invalues from 4 to 3 to 2 to 1 relative to the second point 615 a, thirdpoint 620 a, fourth point 625 a and end point 630 a of subsequent trace605 signifies that the individual began the trace of the β pattern witha high velocity up the tail of the β pattern and then slowed down tocomplete the rest of the trace of the β pattern. The following steps ofprocess 400 may maintain this inter-relationship of the x-coordinateposition, y-coordinate position, and velocity to authenticate theidentity of the individual. Example input data matrix 510 includesinteger values relating the x-coordinate position, y-coordinateposition, and velocity. However, these values are arbitrary values usedfor simplicity. The actual values may be values relative to themotion-based authentication communications device 110 that captures theinput data (e.g., Cartesian coordinate system of user interface 140)and/or any other modification to the input data so that theinter-relationship of the input data may be analyzed to authenticate theidentity of the individual that will be apparent to those skilled in therelevant art(s) without departing from the spirit and scope of theinvention. In an example embodiment, step 410 may be performed bytransceiver 1220 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 420, an input eigenvector matrix may be generated. In generatingthe input eigenvector matrix, a covariance matrix for the input data mayfirst be generated. As noted above, the inter-relationship of each pieceof input data to each other is to be maintained through the analysis ofauthenticating the identity of the individual. The covariance matrix ofthe input data determines the inter-relationship of the input data.Example input data covariance matrix 520 depicted in FIG. 5B is thecovariance matrix for example input data matrix 510. Example input datacovariance matrix 520 compares each piece of input data to each otherpiece of input data to determine the impact that each piece of inputdata had on each other piece of input data during the subsequent trace605 of the β pattern. As can be seen in example input data covariancematrix 520, the x-coordinate position is compared to itself,y-coordinate position, and the velocity throughout the subsequent trace605 to determine the impact the x-coordinate position had on itself, they-coordinate position, and the velocity throughout the subsequent trace605. Example input data covariance matrix 520 determines the impact thatthe y-coordinate position and the velocity had on the x-coordinateposition, y-coordinate position and the velocity in a similar fashion.

For example, FIG. 6A depicts identity authentication of the individualbased on an independent comparison of motion-based behavior data.Example independent comparison of motion-based behavior data 600 depictsa comparison of input data generated by subsequent trace 605 to aprevious authentication trace 635. The previous authentication trace 635may have been completed by the individual during a previousauthentication attempt. The previous authentication trace 635 includesinitial point 610 b, second point 615 b, third point 620 b, fourth point625 b, and end point 630 b. Example independent comparison ofmotion-based behavior data 600 independently compares the x-coordinateposition of the subsequent trace 605 to the x-coordinate position of theprevious authentication trace 635 and determines whether thex-coordinate position is within the threshold for the individual toauthenticate the individual. Example independent comparison ofmotion-based behavior data 600 executes similar comparisons for they-coordinate position and the velocity as discussed in great detailabove in FIGS. 2 and 3.

However, example inter-related comparison of motion-based behavior data650 shown in FIG. 6B depicts a comparison of the inter-relationship ofthe input data by adjusting the input data to account for theinter-relationship of the input data. Adjusted subsequent trace 655depicts the adjustment of the input data that accounts for theinter-relationship of the input data as generated in example input datacovariance matrix 520. The adjusted subsequent trace includes initialpoint 610 c, second point 615 c, third point 620 c, fourth point 625 c,and end point 630 c. As can be seen in FIG. 6B, the adjusted subsequenttrace 655 has a rightward bias applied to it as compared to thesubsequent trace 605. For example, fourth point 625 c is further to theright in adjusted subsequent trace 655 as compared to fourth point 625 ain subsequent trace 605.

In such an example, the velocities captured during the subsequent trace605 had an impact on the x-coordinate positions and the y-coordinatepositions. The impact was captured in the example input data covariancematrix 520 that determined the inter-relationship between the velocitiesand the x-coordinate positions and the y-coordinate positions. Theimpact is visible in the rightward bias of the adjusted subsequent trace655 as compared to the subsequent trace 605. As will be discussed infurther detail below, an imposter would not only have to have each pieceof input data independently fall within thresholds, but would also haveto impersonate the impact that the velocities have on the x-coordinatepositions and the y-coordinate positions to generate an adjustedsubsequent trace that is within a threshold of the adjusted subsequenttrace 655 to successfully log-in as the individual.

After example input data covariance matrix 520 is generated, aneigenvector matrix for the input data may be generated from exampleinput data covariance matrix 520. As noted above, the input dataobtained from the subsequent trace 605 is to be compared to thepreviously captured motion-based behavior data captured from theprevious authentication trace 635. For ease of discussion, previouslycaptured motion-based behavior data captured as the individual completesa previous authentication trace, e.g., completing the initialauthentication template, will be referred to as reference data.

In order to adequately compare the input data from the subsequent trace605 to the reference data from the previous authentication trace 635,the data is to be compared relative to the inter-relationship of theinput data to the inter-relationship of the reference data. Transformingthe input data and the reference data into respective eigenvectormatrices provides the multi-variable statistical analysis capability toadequately compare the input data to the reference data whilemaintaining the inter-relationship of the input data and the referencedata. Example input data eigenvector matrix 530 that is depicted in FIG.5C is the input data eigenvector matrix for the input data derived fromexample input data covariance matrix 520. In an example embodiment, step420 may be performed by comparing module 1280 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 430, example input data eigenvector matrix 530 may be rotated.As noted above, transforming the input data and the reference data intorespective eigenvector matrices adequately compares the input data tothe reference data while maintaining the inter-relationship of the inputdata and the reference data. In order to compare the inter-relationshipof the input data and the reference data, the input vectors included inexample input data eigenvector matrix 530 may be rotated.

For example, the input data included in example input data eigenvectormatrix 530 may be rotated 90 degrees. In order to rotate the inputvectors included in example input data eigenvector matrix 530, exampleinput data eigenvector matrix 530 may be multiplied with example inputdata matrix 510 to generate example rotated input eigenvector matrix 540as shown in FIG. 5D. Example rotated input eigenvector matrix 540exhibits that the input vectors included in example input dataeigenvector matrix 530 relative to the input data included in exampleinput data matrix 510 have been rotated 90 degrees. The input vectorsmay be rotated in any fashion to compare the input data to the referencedata while maintaining the inter-relationship for each that will beapparent to those skilled in the relevant art(s) without departing fromthe spirit and scope of the invention. In an example embodiment, step430 may be performed by comparing module 1280 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 440, reference data may be received from motion-based behaviordata database 190. Step 440 has been discussed in detail above where thereference data has been stored in motion-based behavior data database190 and then is retrieved to be compared to the input data once theinput data has been captured. As noted above, the reference dataincludes previously captured motion-based behavior data captured as theindividual completes a previous authentication trace, e.g., completingthe initial authentication template. The reference data is capturedbefore the input data and is stored in motion-based behavior datadatabase 190. After the input data has been captured, the reference datamay be retrieved from motion-based behavior data database 190 to beprocessed and then compared to the input data while maintaining theinter-relationship between the reference data and the input data.

FIG. 5E provides an example reference data matrix 550 for the individualcompleting the trace of the pattern in a previous attempt to establishan authentication template and/or a previous log-in attempt. As notedabove, the individual is completing the trace of the β pattern which isshown as previous authentication trace 635 in FIG. 6. The x-coordinateposition, the y-coordinate position, and the velocity captured from thetrace corresponds to initial point 610 b, second point 615 b, thirdpoint 620 b, fourth point 625 b and end point 630 b on previousauthentication trace 635. In an example embodiment, step 440 may beperformed by transceiver 1220 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 450, a transposed reference eigenvector matrix may be generated.In generating the transposed reference eigenvector matrix, a covariancematrix for the reference data may first be generated. The covariancematrix of the reference data determines the inter-relationship of thereference data. Example reference data covariance matrix 560 depicted inFIG. 5F is the covariance matrix for example reference data covariancematrix 560. Example reference data covariance matrix 560 compares eachpiece of reference data to each other piece of reference data todetermine the impact that each piece of reference data had on each otherpiece of reference data during the previous authentication trace 635 ofthe β pattern. As can be seen in example reference data covariancematrix 560, the x-coordinate position is compared to itself,y-coordinate position, and the velocity throughout the previousauthentication trace 635 to determine the impact the x-coordinateposition had on itself, the y-coordinate position, and the velocitythroughout the previous authentication trace 635. Example reference datacovariance matrix 560 determines the impact that the y-coordinateposition and the velocity had on the x-coordinate position, y-coordinateposition and the velocity in a similar fashion.

After example reference data covariance matrix 560 is generated aneigenvector matrix for the reference data may be generated from examplereference data covariance matrix 560. In order to adequately compare theinput data from the subsequent trace 605 to the reference data from theprevious authentication trace 635, the data is to be compared relativeto the inter-relationship of the input data to the inter-relationship ofthe reference data. Transforming the input data and the reference datainto respective eigenvector matrices provides the multi-variablestatistical analysis capability to adequately compare the input data tothe reference data while maintaining the inter-relationship of the inputdata and the reference data. Example reference data eigenvector matrix570 that is depicted in FIG. 5G is the reference data eigenvector matrixfor the reference data derived from example reference data covariancematrix 560.

After example reference data eigenvector matrix 570 is generated atranspose of example reference data eigenvector matrix 570 may begenerated. After the input vectors included in example input dataeigenvector matrix 530 have been rotated, the input vectors may then berotated back into their original coordinate space while being projectedonto the reference vectors included in example reference dataeigenvector matrix 570 with the transpose of the example reference dataeigenvector matrix 570. The transpose of the reference data eigenvectormatrix 570 provides the crossover of the input data to the referencedata so that the inter-relationship of the input data may be compared tothe inter-relationship of the reference data. Example transposereference data eigenvector matrix 580 that is depicted in FIG. 5H is thetranspose of example reference data eigenvector matrix 570. In anexample embodiment, step 450 may be performed by comparing module 1280as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 460, a re-keyed input data matrix may be generated. As notedabove, transforming the input data and the reference data intorespective eigenvector matrices provides the multi-variable statisticalanalysis capability to adequately compare the input data to thereference data while maintaining the inter-relationship of the inputdata and the reference data. The rotated input vectors in example inputdata eigenvector matrix 530 may be rotated back into their originalcoordinate space while being projected onto the reference vectorsincluded in example reference data eigenvector matrix 570. Theprojection of the rotated input vectors onto the reference vectorsprovides an adequate comparison of the inter-relationship of the inputdata to the inter-relationship of the reference data. The rotated inputvectors in example input data eigenvector matrix 530 may be rotated backinto their original coordinate space while be projected onto thereference vectors included in example reference data eigenvector matrix570 by multiplying example input data eigenvector matrix 530 withtranspose reference data eigenvector matrix 580. The multiplying ofexample input data eigenvector matrix 530 with transpose reference dataeigenvector matrix 580 may provide example re-keyed input data matrix590 that is depicted in FIG. 5I.

As noted above, FIGS. 6A and 6B depict a comparison between identityauthentication of the individual based on an independent comparison ofinput data to reference data (example independent comparison ofmotion-based behavior data 600) to an inter-related comparison of inputdata to reference data (example inter-related comparison of motion-basedbehavior data 650). Re-keyed input data matrix 590 includes thereference data depicted in adjusted subsequent trace 655 that accountsfor the inter-relationship of the input data. As can be seen in FIG. 6B,the adjusted subsequent trace 655 has a rightward bias applied to it ascompared to the subsequent trace 605 due to the impact of the velocitiesto the x-coordinate positions and the y-coordinate positions of theadjusted subsequent trace 655.

For example, the input data for the fourth point 625 a regarding thesubsequent trace 605 as shown in example input data matrix 510 is 4 forthe x-coordinate position, 3 for the y-coordinate position, and 2 forthe velocity. The reference data for the fourth point 625 b regardingthe previous authentication trace 635 as shown in example reference datamatrix 550 is 3 for the x-coordinate position, 3 for the y-coordinateposition, and 3 for the velocity. As can be seen in example independentcomparison of motion-based behavior data 600, the x-coordinate positionfor the subsequent trace 605 is slightly greater than the x-coordinateposition for the previous authentication trace 635 while they-coordinate positions for both are similar.

The re-keyed input data for the fourth point 625 c regarding theadjusted subsequent trace 655 as shown in example re-keyed input datamatrix is 5.38 for the x-coordinate position, 2.59 for the y-coordinateposition and 2.5 for the velocity. As can be seen in exampleinter-related comparison of motion-based behavior data 650, thex-coordinate position for the adjusted subsequent trace 655 is slightlygreater than the x-coordinate position of the previous authenticationtrace 635 and the y-coordinate position is slightly less than they-coordinate position of the previous authentication trace 635 due tothe inter-relationship of the velocity to the x-coordinate position andthe y-coordinate position. In an example embodiment, step 460 may beperformed by comparing module 1280 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 470, the individual variables included in example re-keyed inputdata matrix 590 may be compared to the individual variables included inexample reference data matrix 550. After the input data has beenprojected onto the reference data and rotated back into its originalcoordinate space as provided by example re-keyed input data matrix 590,each re-keyed input data is in a condition to be adequately compared tothe reference data while maintaining the inter-relationship between eachvariable. For example, the re-keyed input variable of the x-coordinateposition at initial point 610 c on adjusted subsequent trace 655 iscompared to the reference variable of the x-coordinate position atinitial point 610 b on previous authentication trace 635. The re-keyedx-coordinate position incorporates the impact of the velocity on thex-coordinate position and can be compared to the reference x-coordinateposition. The re-keyed input data may be compared to the reference datain a similar fashion the motion-based behavior data is compared to thepreviously captured motion-based behavior data discussed in detail abovein FIG. 2. In an example embodiment, step 470 may be performed bycomparing module 1280 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 480, the individual's identity may be authenticated and/orrejected. As discussed in detail above in FIG. 2 regardingauthenticating and rejecting, the identity of the individual may beauthenticated and/or rejected based on the comparison of the re-keyedinput data to the reference data. The identity of the individual may beauthenticated when motion-based behavior data is within a threshold ofpreviously captured motion-based behavior data. The authentication ofthe identity individual may be rejected when the motion-based behaviordata is outside a threshold of previously captured motion-based behaviordata.

An exemplary threshold determination technique according to embodimentsof the present disclosure determine the threshold for each inputvariable based on learning the fluctuation that the individual has foreach input variable during each subsequent trace. Each time theindividual completes the trace of the pattern, the fluctuation for eachinput variable for the trace may be recorded and then the threshold foreach input variable may be determined based on the learned fluctuation.The individual may have greater fluctuation for specific input variableswhile having less fluctuation regarding other input variables.

For example, the individual may approach the trace of the pattern with arelatively slow velocity in order to maintain the accuracy of thex-coordinate positions and the y-coordinate positions within thepattern. As a result, the individual may have little fluctuation in thex-coordinate positions and y-coordinate positions each time theindividual completes the trace while the velocities at each point on thetrace may have greater fluctuations. In such an example, the slightfluctuations in the x-coordinate positions and the y-coordinatepositions may be recorded and the threshold required to authenticate theidentity of the individual based on the x-coordinate positions and they-coordinate positions is determined as +/−5%. The greater fluctuationsin velocities may be recorded and the threshold required to authenticatethe identity of the individual based on velocities is determined as+/−10%. The identity of the individual may be authenticated and/orrejected based on the determined thresholds. As a result, the thresholdsfor each input variable may be customized to the individual.

The identity of the individual may be authenticated and/or rejectedbased on a scoring system. The quantity of input variables that theindividual was within the determined threshold and the quantity of inputvariables that the individual was outside the determined threshold maybe tallied and a score based on the tally may be determined. Theidentity of the individual may be authenticated when the score is abovea threshold and the identity of the individual may be rejected when thescore is below the threshold. The threshold that the score is to exceedto authenticate the identity of the individual may be when 100% of thethresholds for each input variable have been satisfied, a percentage ofthe thresholds that have been satisfied, 100% of selected thresholds forselected input variables have been satisfied, based on statisticalanalysis of the satisfied thresholds, based on weights applied to eachsatisfied threshold, and/or any other scoring technique to accuratelyauthenticate and/or reject the identity of the individual that will beapparent to those skilled in the relevant art(s) without departing fromthe spirit and scope of the invention.

Two-Dimension Motion-Based Identity Authentication Using Contact Data

As discussed in detail above, motion-based authentication communicationsdevice 110 may authenticate the identity of the individual based onmotion-based behavior data captured by motion-based authenticationcommunications device 110 as the individual traces the pattern. Asdiscussed in detail above, an embodiment consistent with the inventioncompares the captured motion-based behavior data to previously capturedmotion-based behavior data that was previously captured by motion-basedauthentication communications device 110 from the individual during aprevious log-in and/or authentication attempt.

Authentication of the identity of the individual using contact data thatis a specific type of motion-based behavior data captured bymotion-based authentication communications device 110 as the individualtraces the pattern is discussed in further detail below. Contact data ismotion-based behavior data generated by the contact of the individual'sfinger with the multi-touch display of user interface 140. In anexamplary embodiment, the analysis of contact data may be performed byanalyzer 1210 as shown in FIG. 12.

For example, the contact data may include and/or be related to thepressure applied to the multi-touch display as the individual traces thepattern with the individual's finger. In another example, the contactdata may include and/or be related to the forces applied to themulti-touch display as the individual traces the pattern with theindividual's finger. In another example, the contact data may includeand/or be related to the moments applied to the multi-touch display asthe individual traces the pattern with the individual's finger.

One such implementation of authenticating the identity of the individualbased on the contact data generated by the contact of the individual'sfinger with the multi-touch display when tracing the pattern isillustrated in a pressure cloud configuration 700 in FIG. 7. Pressurecloud configuration 700 includes user interface 140 that depicts aplurality of pressure clouds 710(a-n), where n is an integer greaterthan or equal to one. Pressure clouds 710(a-n) may be generated when theindividual's finger is in contact with the multi-touch display of userinterface 140 as the individual traces the pattern. Each pressure cloud710(a-n) may be an imprint on multi-touch display resulting from thepressure that is applied by the individual onto the multi-touch display.In an example embodiment, the capturing of pressure clouds 710(a-n) maybe performed by capturing module 1240 as shown in FIG. 12.

The size of each pressure cloud 710(a-n) may differ based on the amountof pressure applied to the multi-touch display by the individual. Thesize of pressure clouds 710(a-n) may increase as the individualincreases the amount of pressure applied to the multi-touch display. Asthe individual increases the pressure applied to the multi-touchdisplay, the finger tissue associated with the finger in contact withthe multi-touch display compresses further thus increasing the size ofpressure clouds 710(a-n).

The amount of pressure applied to the multi-touch display may differ asthe individual traces the pattern. For example, the individual initiatesthe trace of the pattern with little pressure based on the small size ofpressure cloud 710 a. The individual then increases the pressure appliedto the multi-touch display based on the increase in size of pressureclouds 710 b and 710 c. The individual then decreases the pressure withthe decrease in size of pressure cloud 710 d before making the turn intracing the pattern where the pressure again increases with the increasein size of pressure cloud 710 e and so on. In an example embodiment, thedetermination of each size for each pressure cloud 710(a-n) may beperformed by determination module 1290 as shown in FIG. 12.

The sequence of pressure applied by the individual when tracing thepattern may be a behaviometric characteristic associated with theindividual in that the sequence of pressure applied by the individualmay be within a threshold each time the individual completes thepattern. Further, the sequence of pressure applied by the individual maybe difficult to replicate by another individual attempting tofraudulently impersonate the individual. As a result, the size ofpressure clouds 710(a-n) may be compared to the sizes of previouslycaptured pressure clouds to authenticate the identity of the individualas discussed in detail above. In an example embodiment, the comparisonof pressure clouds 710(a-n) with previously captured pressure clouds maybe performed by comparing module 1280 as shown in FIG. 12.

In an embodiment, each pressure cloud 710(a-n) generated by theindividual may be an ellipse. As a result, each pressure cloud 710(a-n)may include a major axis, a minor axis, and an elliptical angle. Thearea of each pressure cloud 710(a-n) may be determined based on themajor axis, minor axis, and the elliptical angle of each pressure cloud710(a-n). The size of each pressure cloud 710(a-n) may be based on thearea of each pressure cloud 710(a-n) so that the area of each pressurecloud 710(a-n) may be compared to the areas of previously capturedpressure clouds to authenticate the identity of the individual. In anexample embodiment, the comparison of the area of pressure clouds710(a-n) with the areas of previously captured pressure clouds may beperformed by comparing module 1280 as shown in FIG. 12.

As the individual changes the amount of pressure that the individualapplies to the multi-touch display, the major axis, the minor axis, andthe elliptical angle of the pressure cloud resulting from the touchingof the multi-touch display also change. For example, as shown inelliptical pressure cloud configuration 800 in FIG. 8, pressure cloud710 a includes a major axis 810, a minor axis 820, and an ellipticalangle 830. The area of pressure cloud 710 a may be calculated based onmajor axis 810, minor axis 820, and elliptical angle 830. As theindividual changes the amount of pressure that the individual applies tothe multi-touch display, major axis 810, minor axis 820, and ellipticalangle 830 also change, thus changing the area of pressure cloud 710 a.The area may then be compared to the areas of previously capturedpressure clouds to authenticate the identity of the individual. Majoraxis 810, minor axis 820, and elliptical angle 830 may also be comparedto the major axis, minor axis, and elliptical angles of previouslycaptured pressure clouds to authenticate the identity of the individual.In an example embodiment, the major axis 810, minor axis 820, ellipticalangle 830 and the area of pressure cloud 710 a may be calculated withcalculation module 1005 as shown in FIG. 10.

Another such implementation of authenticating the identity of theindividual based on the contact data generated by the contact of theindividual's finger with the multi-touch display when tracing thepattern is illustrated in a force configuration 900 in FIG. 9. Forceconfiguration 900 includes user interface 140. As the individual'sfinger is in contact with the multi-touch display of user interface 140,forces are generated and projected onto the multi-touch display inthree-dimensions that include an x-direction force 910, a y-directionforce 930, and a z-direction force 920. X-direction force 910 may be atangential force projected onto the multi-touch display in thex-direction. Y-direction force 930 may be a tangential force projectedonto the multi-touch display in the y-direction. Z-direction force 920may be a vertical force projected onto the multi-touch display in thez-direction. From x-direction force 910, y-direction force 930, andz-direction force 920, a resultant vector 940 may be calculated. In anexample embodiment, the capturing of x-direction force 910, y-directionforce 930, and z-direction force 920 may be performed by capturingmodule 1240 as shown in FIG. 12.

The magnitudes of x-direction force 910, y-direction force 930, andz-direction force 920 may differ based on the amount of force applied tothe multi-touch display by the individual. The magnitudes of x-directionforce 910, y-direction force 930, and z-direction force 920 may increaseas the individual increases the amount of force applied to themulti-touch display.

The sequence of force applied by the individual when tracing the patternmay be a behaviometric characteristic associated with the individual inthat the sequence of forces applied by the individual may be within athreshold each time the individual completes the pattern. Further, thesequence of forces applied by the individual may be difficult toreplicate by another individual attempting to fraudulently impersonatethe individual. As a result the magnitude of x-direction force 910,y-direction force 930, and z-direction force 920 may increase as theindividual increases the amount of force applied to the multi-touchdisplay. In an example embodiment, the comparison of the magnitudes ofx-direction force 910, y-direction force 930, and z-direction force 920with previously captured forces may be performed by comparing module1280 as shown in FIG. 12.

In an embodiment, resultant vector 940 may be calculated fromx-direction force 910, y-direction force 930, and z-direction force 920.Resultant vector 940 may be an Euclidean normalization of x-directionforce 910, y-direction force 930, and z-direction force 920. Resultantvector 940 may be calculated based on the combination of x-directionforce 910 with y-direction force 930, x-direction force 910 withz-direction force 920, and y-direction force 930 with z-direction force920. Resultant vector 940 may include a magnitude and a directionalangle. In an example embodiment, the magnitude and directional angle ofresultant vector 940 may be calculated with calculation module 1205 asshown in FIG. 12.

The magnitude of resultant vector 940 may be determined based on theamount of force applied by the individual to the multi-touch display.For example, the magnitude of resultant vector 940 may be greater whenan individual with a large hand with a large mass traces the patternthan when an individual with a smaller hand with a smaller mass tracesthe pattern. The directional angle of resultant vector 940 may providethe direction that the individual's finger is heading as the individualtraces the pattern. The magnitude and directional angle of resultantvector 940 may be compared to magnitudes and directional angles ofpreviously captured resultant vectors to authenticate the identity ofthe individual. In an example embodiment, the comparison of themagnitude and directional angle of resultant vector 940 with themagnitudes and directional angles of previously captured resultantvectors may be performed by comparing module 1280 as shown in FIG. 12.

X-direction force 910, y-direction 930, and z-direction force 920 mayalso provide additional behaviometric characteristics that are unique tothe individual as the individual completes the trace of the pattern.X-direction force 910 and y-direction force 930 may provide indicationsto when the individual's finger changes direction. As the individual'sfinger changes direction when tracing the pattern, the tangential forcesin x-direction force 910 and y-direction force 930 also change directionso that there is a zero-crossing by x-direction force 910 andy-direction 930. For example, x-direction force 910 and y-directionforce 930 may shift from negative values to positive values when theindividual's finger changes direction so that that x-direction force 910and y-direction force 930 cross the value of “0” when shifting fromnegative values to positive values. The location of where thezero-crossings occurred relative to the pattern may be compared toprevious locations of where previous zero-crossings occurred duringprevious traces to authenticate the individual.

As noted above, z-direction force 920 may be the vertical force that isapplied to the multi-touch display that is related to the size of anindividual's hand that is applying z-direction force 920. A hackerattempting to fraudulently impersonate the individual would have tomimic the magnitude of z-direction force 920 applied to the multi-touchdisplay during the trace of the pattern. For example, the hacker with alarger hand than the individual would have to somehow lighten themagnitude of z-direction force 920 applied to the multi-touch displaywhen attempting to impersonate the individual. Even if the hacker wasable to lighten the magnitude of z-direction force 920, the likelihoodof the hacker becoming less accurate and/or slower in tracing thepattern increases due to the compensation to lighten the magnitude ofz-direction force 920 which would also indicate the hacker is attemptingto fraudulently impersonate the individual.

Another such implementation of authenticating the identity of theindividual based on the contact data generated by the contact of theindividual's finger with the multi-touch display when tracing thepattern is illustrated in a moment configuration 1000 in FIG. 10. Momentconfiguration 1000 includes user interface 140. As the individual'sfinger is in contact with the multi-touch display of user interface 140,moments are generated and projected onto the multi-touch display inthree-dimensions that include an x-direction moment 1010, a y-directionmoment 1030, and a z-direction moment 1020. X-direction moment 1010 maydepict the rotation of the individual's finger in the x-axis.Y-direction moment 1030 may depict the rotation of the individual'sfinger in the y-axis. Z-direction moment 1020 may depict the surfacerotation of the individual's finger relative to the multi-touch display.In an example embodiment, the capturing of x-direction moment 1010,y-direction moment 1030, and z-direction moment 1020 may be performed bycapturing module 1240 as shown in FIG. 12.

The x-direction moment 1010, y-direction moment 1030, and z-directionmoment 1020 may depict the magnitude of rotation that occurs along eachrespective axis. As the rotation of the individual's finger along eachrespective axis increases, the magnitude of x-direction moment 1010,y-direction moment 1030, and z-direction moment 1020 also increase. Forexample, the magnitude of x-direction moment 1010 increases as therotation of the individual's finger along the x-axis increases. Themagnitude of y-direction moment 1030 increases as the rotation of theindividual's finger along the y-axis increases. The magnitude ofz-direction moment 1020 increases as the rotation of the individual'sfinger along the z-axis increases.

The sequence of moments applied by the individual when tracing thepattern may be a behaviometric characteristic associated with theindividual in that the sequence of moments applied by the individual maybe within a threshold each time the individual completes the pattern.Further, the sequence of moments applied by the individual may bedifficult to replicate by another individual attempting to fraudulentlyimpersonate the individual. In an example embodiment, the comparison ofthe magnitudes of x-direction moment 1010, y-direction moment 1030, andz-direction moment 1020 with previously captured moments may beperformed by comparing module 1280 as shown in FIG. 12.

Multi-Layer Identity Authentication Using Motion-Based IdentityAuthentication

Motion-based authentication communications device 110 may authenticatethe identity of the individual with multiple layers of identityauthentication. Motion-based authentication communications device 110may first prompt the individual with a security question. If theindividual correctly answers the security question, motion-basedauthentication communications device 110 may then display to theindividual via user interface 140 a pattern for the individual to trace.Motion-based authentication communications device 110 may authenticatethe identity of the individual based on motion-based behavior datacaptured by motion-based authentication communications device 110 as theindividual traces the pattern. An embodiment consistent with theinvention then confirms the authentication with the entity that theindividual is attempting to engage. Motion-based authenticationcommunications device 110 may then receive a personal identificationnumber (PIN) from an identification server 1225 associated with theentity. Motion-based authentication communications device 110 mayprovide the PIN to the individual so that the individual may then engagethe entity.

One such implementation of multi-layer authentication based on thecomparison of motion-based behavior data to previously capturedmotion-based behavior data is illustrated by process 1100 in FIG. 11.Process 1100 includes ten primary steps: prompt the individual with asecurity question 1110, receive an answer to the security question 1120,reject the identity authentication of the individual 1130, display thedefined pattern 1140, receive a traced pattern 1150, comparemotion-based behavior data with previously captured motion-basedbehavior data 1160, reject the identity authentication of the individual1170, authenticate the identity of the individual 1180, transmitauthentication confirmation 1190, and receive a PIN, 1195. Steps1110-1195 are typically implemented in a computer, e.g., via softwareand/or hardware, e.g., motion-based authentication communications device110 of FIG. 12.

In step 1110, the individual may be prompted via user interface 140 witha security question when the individual requests to engage the entity.The security question may be a question in that the answer to thequestion is an object that may be displayed to the individual via userinterface 140 when the individual correctly answers the securityquestion. For example, the security question may be “Never endingjourney?” so that the answer to the question may be infinity so thatuser interface 140 may display an ∞ pattern to the individual after theindividual correctly answers the security question. In another example,the security question may be “My favorite fruit?” so that the answer tothe question may be a pattern of an apple so that user interface 140 maydisplay an apple pattern to the individual after the individualcorrectly answers the security question.

In an embodiment, the individual may initially select the answer to eachsecurity question by selecting the appropriate pattern that theindividual requests to be the answer to the security question when theindividual is initially signing up for the identity authenticationrequired by the entity. For example, the individual is initiallyprovided the security question of “My favorite fruit?” when theindividual is enrolling as a customer of a bank. The individual may thenselect from different patterns depicting an apple, an orange, a banana,and/or any other pattern of a fruit that the individual requests to bedisplayed to them after the individual correctly answers the question.Each future identification authentication session engaged by theindividual may display the pattern of the apple when the individualcorrectly answers the security question of “My favorite fruit?”.

In an embodiment, the security question may be provided byidentification server 1215. Identification server 1215 may be a serverassociated with the entity that is engaged to the identityauthentications sessions. Identification server 1215 may randomly selectthe security question from a plurality of security questions when theindividual is initially signing up for the identity authenticationrequired by the entity and associate that security question with theindividual. The answer to the security question as selected by theindividual may be provided to identification server 1215 so thatidentification server 1215 may store the answer to the security questionwith the security question associated with the individual. The patternassociated with the answer to the security question may also be providedto identification server 1215 for storage by identification server 1215.In an example embodiment, step 1110 may be performed by prompting module1270 and transceiver 1220 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 1120, an answer to the security question may be received. Theindividual may input the answer to the security question via userinterface 140. The answer to the security question may then bedetermined as correct or incorrect. As noted above, the individualselected the answer to the security question when initially signing upfor the identity authentication required by the entity. The answerreceived for the current authentication session may be compared to theanswer initially selected when initially signing up for the identityauthentication required by the entity. In an example embodiment, step1120 may be performed by transceiver 1220 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 1130, the identity authentication may be rejected when anincorrect answer to the security question is received. Identificationserver 1215 may be alerted of the rejected identity authentication.Identification server 1215 may store characteristics of the rejectedidentity authentication session so that when the imposter attempts toengage future authentication sessions associated with the entity,identification server 1215 may be able to identify the imposter asattempting fraudulently engage the entity. In an example embodiment step1130 may be performed by rejection module 1250 and transceiver 1220 asshown in FIG. 12.

In step 1140, the pattern that is associated with the correct answer tothe security question may be displayed to the individual via userinterface 140 after the correct answer to the security question isreceived. As noted above, the individual may have selected a patternthat depicts the correct answer to the security question. For example,after the individual correctly answers the security question of “Myfavorite fruit?” with apple, user interface 140 displays a pattern of anapple to the individual. In an example embodiment, step 1240 may beperformed by user interface 140 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 1150, a trace completed by the individual of the pattern thatdepicts the correct answer to the security question may be received.Step 1150 is similar to step 220 as discussed in detail above. However,the motion-based behavior data captured from the trace completed by theindividual may be stored in motion-based behavior data database 190 thatis associated with motion-based authentication communications device 110rather than storing the motion-based behavior data in identificationserver 1215. Storing motion-based behavior data in motion-based behaviordata database 190 independent from identification server 1215 prevents ahacker from obtaining the motion-based behavior data by hacking intoidentification server 1215. Rather, a hacker would have to hack intomotion-based authentication communications device 110 to obtain themotion-based behavior data. Even if the hacker were to obtain themotion-based behavior data, as noted in detail above, motion-basedbehavior data that is substantially similar to previously capturedmotion-based behavior would result in a rejection of the identityauthentication of the hacker. In step 1160, motion-based behavior datamay be compared with previously captured motion-based behavior data.Step 1160 is similar to step 250 as discussed in detail above.

In step 1170, the identity authentication of the individual may berejected when the motion-based behavior data captured from the tracedpattern is outside a threshold from the previously captured motion-basedbehavior data. Step 1170 is similar to step 270 as discussed in detailabove. However, identification server 1215 associated with the entitymay be alerted of the rejected identity authentication when themotion-based behavior data is not within the threshold of the previouslycaptured motion-based behavior data. Identification server 1215 maystore the fraudulent motion-based behavior data captured from theimposter fraudulently attempting to engage the entity as the individual.Identification server 1215 may then generate an alert each time thefraudulent motion-based behavior data is received to prevent theimposter from engaging the entity as the individual in future identityauthentication sessions. In an example embodiment, step 1170 may beperformed by rejection module 1150 and transceiver 1120 as shown in FIG.12.

In step 1180, the identity of the individual may be authenticated whenthe motion-based behavior data captured from the traced pattern iswithin a threshold of the previously captured motion-based behaviordata. Step 1180 is similar to step 260 as discussed in detail above.

In step 1190, authentication confirmation of the identity authenticationof the individual may be transmitted to identification server 1215.Authentication confirmation of the identity authentication of theindividual may be transmitted to identification server 1215 when themotion-based behavior data captured from the trace of the pattern by theindividual is within a threshold of the previously captured motion-basedbehavior data. As noted in detail above, each time the individualcompletes the trace of the pattern, the motion-based behavior data mayvary within the threshold of the previously captured motion-basedbehavior data. As a result, randomization is generated by themotion-based behavior data used to authenticate the individual becausethe motion-based behavior data may be different each time the individualtraces the pattern. The randomization of the motion-based behavior dataprevents an imposter from being able to fraudulently impersonate theindividual. In an example embodiment, step 1190 may be performed bytransceiver 1120 as shown in FIG. 12.

In step 1195, a PIN may be received from identification server 1215.After identification server 1215 receives confirmation that the identityof the individual has been authenticated, identification server 1215 mayquery personal identification number database 1225 for a random PIN.Identification server 1215 may then provide the randomly selected pin tobe displayed to the individual by user interface 140. The individual maythen enter the randomly selected PIN into the authentication session. Atthat point, the individual may be given access to engage the entity. Therandomization of selecting the random PIN by identification server 1215provides an additional level of randomization to the process. Not onlyis the motion-based behavior data generated in a random fashion, therandom PIN generated after confirmation that the motion-based behaviordata is within the threshold of the previously captured motion-basedbehavior data is also random. Each time the individual successfullyengages future authentication sessions, identification server 1215 mayprovide a different random PIN for each authentication session providingadditional randomness to the authentication process.

Further, the random PIN is stored in personal identification numberdatabase 1225 that is independent from motion-based authenticationcommunications device 110 so that the random PIN is stored in a locationindependent from where the motion-based behavior data is stored. As aresult, a hacker would have to hack into identification server 1215 tosomehow obtain the randomly generated PIN and also into motion-basedauthentication communications device 110 to obtain the motion-basedbehavior data. The independent storage of the randomly generated PIN andthe motion-based behavior data provides additional layers of security.As noted in detail above, even if the hacker were to obtain themotion-based behavior data and the random PIN, the hacker would still beprevented from fraudulently impersonating the individual if themotion-based behavior data is substantially similar to the previouslygenerated motion-based behavior data.

The random PIN may include but is not limited to sound waves depictingthe random PIN, a Bluetooth signal depicting the random PIN, aparaphrase depicting the random PIN, and/or any other type of randomidentification that may be provided to the individual via identificationserver 1215 to complete the identity authentication that will beapparent to those skilled in the relevant art(s) without departing fromthe spirit and scope of the invention. In an example embodiment, step1195 may be performed by transceiver 1120 as shown in FIG. 12.

Example Motion-Based Identity Authentication System

As shown in FIG. 12, motion-based identity authentication system 1200includes motion-based sensor server 150, network 120, motion-basedsensor system 130, motion-based authentication communications device110, user interface 140, motion-based behavior data database 190,identification server 1215, and personal identification number database1225. Motion-based authentication communications device 110 includes aprompting module 1270, a transceiver 1220, a capturing module 1240, acomparing module 1280, an authentication module 1230, a rejection module1250, a storing module 1260, an analyzer 1210, a determination module1290, and a calculation module 1205.

Modules as described above may be used by motion-based authenticationcommunications device 110. Examples of functionality performed by eachmodule are referenced in the above discussion. However, the abovereferences are examples and are not limiting. The functionality of eachmodule may be performed individually by each module and/or be sharedamong any combination of modules. As referred to herein, a module may beany type of processing (or computing) device having one or moreprocessors. For example, a module can be an individual processor,workstation, mobile device, computer, cluster of computers, set-top box,game console or other device having at least one processor. In anembodiment, multiple modules may be implemented on the same processingdevice. Such a processing device may include software, firmware,hardware, or a combination thereof Software may include one or moreapplications and an operating system. Hardware can include, but may notbe limited to, a processor, memory, and/or graphical user display.

Embodiments can work with software, hardware, and/or operating systemimplementations other than those described herein. Any software,hardware, and operating system implementations suitable for performingthe functions described herein can be used. Embodiments are applicableto both a client and to a server or a combination of both.

The breadth and scope of the present disclosure should not be limited byany of the above-described example embodiments, but should be definedonly in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for securely authenticating an identity of an individual using a communications device based on a defined pattern that is traced by the individual, comprising: receiving a traced pattern generated from continuously tracing the defined pattern by the individual from an initial point on the defined pattern to an end point on the defined pattern via a user interface of the communications device; analyzing contact data generated from a finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; capturing a plurality of pressure clouds generated from the finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern, wherein each pressure cloud is an imprint the individual generates on a multi-touch display of the user interface based on an amount of pressure that is applied by the individual onto the multi-touch display as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; calculating an area, a length of a major axis, a length of a minor axis, and an angle for an ellipse formed by each pressure cloud; and comparing the area, the length of the major axis, the length of the minor axis, and the angle of the ellipse formed by each pressure cloud with each previously captured area, length of the major axis, length of the minor axis, and the angle of the ellipse formed by each previously captured pressure cloud to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: capturing a plurality of forces generated from the finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; and comparing the plurality of forces with previously captured pluralities of forces to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: calculating a resultant vector from each of the forces generated from the finger being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern, wherein the resultant vector is an Euclidean normalization of the plurality of forces; and comparing the resultant vector with previously captured resultant vectors to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the plurality of forces includes a force applied in the x-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, a force applied in the y-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, and a force applied in the z-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: capturing a plurality of moments generated from the finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern, wherein each moment represents an orientation of the finger as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; and comparing the plurality of moments with previously captured pluralities of moments to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the plurality of moments includes a moment applied in the x-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, a moment applied in the y-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, and a moment applied in the z-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display.
 7. A communications device for securely authenticating an identity of an individual based on a defined pattern that is traced by the individual, comprising: a transceiver configured to: receive a traced pattern generated from continuously tracing the defined pattern by the individual from an initial point on the defined pattern to an end point on the defined pattern via a user interface of the communications device, a capturing module configured to capture a plurality of pressure clouds generated from a finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern, wherein each pressure cloud is an imprint the individual generates on a multi-touch display of the user interface based on an amount of pressure that is applied by the individual onto the multi-touch display as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; an analyzer configured to analyze contact data generated from the finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; a calculation module configured to calculate an area, a length of a major axis, a length of a minor axis, and an angle for an ellipse formed by each pressure cloud; and a comparing module configured to compare the area, the length of the major axis, the length of the minor axis, and the angle of the ellipse formed by each pressure cloud with each previously captured area, length of the major axis, length of the minor axis, and the angle of the ellipse formed by each previously captured pressure cloud to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 8. The communications device of claim 7, wherein: the capturing module is further configured to capture a plurality of forces generated from the finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; and the comparing module is further configured to compare the plurality of forces with previously captured pluralities of forces to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 9. The communications device of claim 8, wherein: the calculation module is further configured to calculate a resultant vector from each of the forces generated from the finger being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern, wherein the resultant vector is an Euclidean normalization of the plurality of forces; and the comparing module is further configured to compare the resultant vector with previously captured resultant vectors to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 10. The communications device of claim 9, wherein the plurality of forces includes a force applied in the x-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, a force applied in the y-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, and a force applied in the z-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display.
 11. The communications device of claim 7, wherein: the capturing module is further configured to capture a plurality of moments generated from the finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern, wherein each moment represents an orientation of the finger as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; and the comparing module is further configured to compare the plurality of moments with previously captured pluralities of moments to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 12. The communications device of claim 11, wherein the plurality of moments includes a moment applied in the x-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, a moment applied in the y-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, and a moment in the z-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display.
 13. A method for securely authenticating an identity of an individual using a communications device based on a defined pattern that is traced by the individual, comprising: receiving a traced pattern generated from continuously tracing the defined pattern by the individual from an initial point on the defined pattern to an end point on the defined pattern via a user interface of the communications device; capturing a plurality of forces generated from the finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; and comparing the plurality of forces with previously captured pluralities of forces to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising: calculating a resultant vector from each of the forces generated from the finger being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern, wherein the resultant vector is an Euclidean normalization of the plurality of forces; and comparing the resultant vector with previously captured resultant vectors to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the plurality of forces include a force applied in the x-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, a force applied in the y-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, and a force applied in the z-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display.
 16. A method for securely authenticating an identity of an individual using a communications device based on a defined pattern that is traced by the individual, comprising: receiving a traced pattern generated from continuously tracing the defined pattern by the individual from an initial point on the defined pattern to an end point on the defined pattern via a user interface of the communications device; capturing a plurality of moments generated from the finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern, wherein each moment represents an orientation of the finger as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; and comparing the plurality of moments with previously captured pluralities of moments to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the plurality of moments includes a moment applied in the x-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, a moment applied in the y-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, and a moment applied in the z-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display.
 18. A communications device for securely authenticating an identity of an individual based on a defined pattern that is traced by the individual, comprising: a transceiver configured to receive a traced pattern generated from continuously tracing the defined pattern by the individual from an initial point on the defined pattern to an end point on the defined pattern via a user interface of the communications device; a capturing module configured to capture a plurality of forces generated from the finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; and a comparing module configured to compare the plurality of forces with previously captured pluralities of forces to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 19. The communications device of claim 18, further comprising: a calculation module configured to calculate a resultant vector from each of the forces generated from the finger being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern, wherein the resultant vector is an Euclidean normalization of the plurality of forces.
 20. The communications device of claim 19, wherein the comparing module is further configured to compare the resultant vector with previously captured resultant vectors to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 21. The communications device of claim 20, wherein the plurality of forces includes a force applied in the x-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, a force applied in the y-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, and a force applied in the z-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display.
 22. A communications device for securely authenticating an identity of an individual based on a defined pattern that is traced by the individual, comprising: a transceiver configured to receive a traced pattern generated from continuously tracing the defined pattern by the individual from an initial point on the defined pattern to an end point on the defined pattern via a user interface of the communications device; a capturing module configured to capture a plurality of moments generated from the finger of the individual being in contact with the user interface of the communications device as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern, wherein each moment represents an orientation of the finger as the individual continuously traces the defined pattern; and a comparing module configured to compare the plurality of moments with previously captured pluralities of moments to thereby authenticate the identity of the individual.
 23. The communications device of claim 22, wherein the plurality of moments includes a moment applied in the x-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, a moment applied in the y-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display, and a moment in the z-direction by the finger contacting the multi-touch display. 